Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Hey Folks - Michael and I had a show here in Columbus at Victorians' Midnight Cafe last October. Maybe you were there. - Uke Man
Monday, April 28, 2008
Bitter ?? Damned Straight !! With good reason!!
Hey Folks -
A while back I expressed my self on the "bitter" controversy.
Robyn Blumner hits it even harder!! You MUST check it out !!
- Uke Man
Obama right to use the word 'bitter'
Monday, April 21, 2008
By Robyn Blumner
Sen. Barack Obama might have been a little too blunt in his quip about how the economic insecurities gripping small-town America manifest themselves, but the word bitter perfectly sums up my feelings these days.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've watched my country get hijacked by a group of self-serving incompetents who have little conscience about sending young men and women to die in an unnecessary war, while putting the bill on a credit card for the next generation.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've seen some of the greatest moral handiwork of modern civilization -- the Geneva Conventions -- get treated as if they were the naive ramblings of out-of-touch do-gooders. I've watched the founding principles of our nation -- the inalienable right of due process and the checks and balances of co-equal branches of government -- treated as a copse to be mowed down on route to the unitary executive.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've stood by as the wealth of our nation has been concentrated in the hands of a tiny elite while the middle class struggles to tread water financially. I've seen our tax policies shift to benefit this small group, starving our national treasury of needed resources and making it far less possible to prepare for the future by investing in infrastructure, education and shoring up Social Security and Medicare.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've watched a macabre health-care system become even more dysfunctional, so that a single accident or illness can destroy the economic security of a family. I've seen Big Pharma use its lobbying muscle to keep Medicare from negotiating better drug prices. I've observed as health-insurance companies with their inflated middleman profits add immeasurably to the cost of care while trying to deny coverage and services to their customers. I've heard our leaders whine about "socialized medicine" anytime a comprehensive fix is suggested.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've seen industry insiders put in charge of regulatory agencies so that worker safety and environmental protection are eroded in the name of increased profits. I've watched as science is subverted to ideology, as facts on climate change are ignored or manipulated to fit a politically driven script. I've seen the Department of Justice transform into the legal arm of the Republican Party.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've watched the dismantling of the wall of separation between church and state, allowing billions of tax dollars to flow to religiously affiliated groups that peddle their own brand of faith as part of the government-funded service. I've seen Christian fundamentalism defeat funding for international family planning and constrain the distribution of condoms in places where AIDS has decimated the population.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've stood by as the national debt nearly doubled in the past seven years because of irresponsible tax cuts and spending on such folly as an endless preemptive war that might end up costing $3 trillion. I've observed the privatization of core government functions, such as the handling of security assignments in Iraq by the unaccountable Blackwater company. I've seen billions of dollars in Iraq reconstruction money wasted and lost to a system of endemic corruption.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've watched our nation get less secure thanks to the counterproductive policies of the neocons in charge. I've seen the populations of otherwise friendly nations turn against the United States, seeing us as the world's biggest bully and hypocrite rather than its greatest beacon of liberty, justice and opportunity. I've observed that our willingness to abuse prisoners has become a recruiting tool for our enemies, making us masters of our own demise.
When more than 80 percent of Americans think we're on the wrong track, I'm not the only one who is bitter. Obama chose the right word.
Robyn Blumner writes for Tribune Media Services.
blumner@sptimes.com
A while back I expressed my self on the "bitter" controversy.
Robyn Blumner hits it even harder!! You MUST check it out !!
- Uke Man
Obama right to use the word 'bitter'
Monday, April 21, 2008
By Robyn Blumner
Sen. Barack Obama might have been a little too blunt in his quip about how the economic insecurities gripping small-town America manifest themselves, but the word bitter perfectly sums up my feelings these days.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've watched my country get hijacked by a group of self-serving incompetents who have little conscience about sending young men and women to die in an unnecessary war, while putting the bill on a credit card for the next generation.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've seen some of the greatest moral handiwork of modern civilization -- the Geneva Conventions -- get treated as if they were the naive ramblings of out-of-touch do-gooders. I've watched the founding principles of our nation -- the inalienable right of due process and the checks and balances of co-equal branches of government -- treated as a copse to be mowed down on route to the unitary executive.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've stood by as the wealth of our nation has been concentrated in the hands of a tiny elite while the middle class struggles to tread water financially. I've seen our tax policies shift to benefit this small group, starving our national treasury of needed resources and making it far less possible to prepare for the future by investing in infrastructure, education and shoring up Social Security and Medicare.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've watched a macabre health-care system become even more dysfunctional, so that a single accident or illness can destroy the economic security of a family. I've seen Big Pharma use its lobbying muscle to keep Medicare from negotiating better drug prices. I've observed as health-insurance companies with their inflated middleman profits add immeasurably to the cost of care while trying to deny coverage and services to their customers. I've heard our leaders whine about "socialized medicine" anytime a comprehensive fix is suggested.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've seen industry insiders put in charge of regulatory agencies so that worker safety and environmental protection are eroded in the name of increased profits. I've watched as science is subverted to ideology, as facts on climate change are ignored or manipulated to fit a politically driven script. I've seen the Department of Justice transform into the legal arm of the Republican Party.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've watched the dismantling of the wall of separation between church and state, allowing billions of tax dollars to flow to religiously affiliated groups that peddle their own brand of faith as part of the government-funded service. I've seen Christian fundamentalism defeat funding for international family planning and constrain the distribution of condoms in places where AIDS has decimated the population.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've stood by as the national debt nearly doubled in the past seven years because of irresponsible tax cuts and spending on such folly as an endless preemptive war that might end up costing $3 trillion. I've observed the privatization of core government functions, such as the handling of security assignments in Iraq by the unaccountable Blackwater company. I've seen billions of dollars in Iraq reconstruction money wasted and lost to a system of endemic corruption.
You bet I'm bitter.
I've watched our nation get less secure thanks to the counterproductive policies of the neocons in charge. I've seen the populations of otherwise friendly nations turn against the United States, seeing us as the world's biggest bully and hypocrite rather than its greatest beacon of liberty, justice and opportunity. I've observed that our willingness to abuse prisoners has become a recruiting tool for our enemies, making us masters of our own demise.
When more than 80 percent of Americans think we're on the wrong track, I'm not the only one who is bitter. Obama chose the right word.
Robyn Blumner writes for Tribune Media Services.
blumner@sptimes.com
Carmen Borgia & Friend - 2nd Night of Ukulele Caravan
Hey Folks -
This time it's really love!!
- Uke Man
This time it's really love!!
- Uke Man
Sunday, April 27, 2008
Chavez isn't a threat to Americans or their interests.He's a threat to greedy Americans whose interests are a threat to honorable Americans' interests
Hey Folks -
Below are dueling columns on the "threat" of Hugo Chavez to America.
See if you don't think that one seems more rationally based on facts and one is intended as political propaganda.
Why the difference??
- Uke Man
Mark Weisbrot: Is Chavez a threat to Latin America's stability?
No: Bush administration's anti-Venezuela policies have skewed the scene
Monday, April 14, 2008
By Mark Weisbrot
Of all the nonsense that we hear regularly about Venezuela, the idea that the country is a security threat is probably the most ridiculous.
For six years, since the Bush administration supported a failed coup against the democratically elected government of President Hugo Chavez, Washington has been sporadically accusing Venezuela of links to terrorism.
During those six years, the charges have been made by anonymous officials, and the U.S. government never produced supporting evidence. Now the Colombian government claims it has proof of the Chavez government's support for the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, commonly known as FARC, a guerrilla group that has been active for four decades. The evidence comes from documents alleged to have been found on laptops captured by the Colombian military in a cross-border bombing and incursion into neighboring Ecuador on March 1.
As with the allegations that led us into the Iraq war, there is less here than meets the eye. First, as The New York Times recently acknowledged, it is impossible to authenticate the files independently. And, even if some of the documents are real, there is nothing showing that Venezuela provided material aid to FARC.
For example, a claim that made headlines all over the world about Chavez supposedly providing $300 million to the guerrillas turned out to be based on a far-fetched interpretation of one alleged document.
Nonetheless, the Bush administration is investigating whether it should place Venezuela on a special list of "state sponsors of terrorism," which would imply at least some kind of economic sanctions. Some right-wing Republicans in the House of Representatives have come up with a similar effort in the form of a proposed resolution.
There will be more of this posturing, combined with wild accusations, because this is an election year. The past two presidential elections were determined by the votes of a few hundred thousand right-wing Cuban-Americans in Florida. These voters hate Venezuela, and we can expect that many politicians will pander to them. On the other hand, Venezuela is our fourth-largest oil supplier and a major importer of U.S. goods, and saner heads will take that into account.
The cheap political points scored by U.S. politicians come at a cost in the rest of the hemisphere. The Bush administration, which is attempting to isolate Venezuela, has accomplished the opposite: Washington is more isolated than ever in Latin America.
When Colombia invaded Ecuador, almost every country south of the Rio Grande condemned this violation of Ecuador's sovereignty, which was also widely seen as carried out with U.S. help or at least approval. When the ensuing political and diplomatic fight was settled -- with no help from Washington -- Ecuadorian President Lula da Silva of Brazil declared Chavez to be "the great peacemaker" in the conflict.
The same is true for the hostage problem in Colombia, where Chavez's efforts to mediate received widespread praise from Europe, Latin America and even the families of the U.S. military contractors held by FARC.
Everyone but U.S. officials in Washington appears to be interested in a negotiated solution to release the hostages held by FARC. When Venezuela mediated a release of hostages Dec. 31, representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador, France, and Switzerland were there. Washington was noticeably absent.
Washington has alienated Latin America through economic policy prescriptions, which are widely associated with Latin America's unprecedented long-term economic failure, through proposed free-trade agreements, which grow more unpopular every year and through the militaristic and failed war on drugs.
The Bush administration thinks it can turn this around by scapegoating Venezuela and hurling accusations of support for terrorism. It won't work; nobody in the region is buying it.
Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
weisbrot@cepr.net
Lawrence J. Haas: Is Chavez a threat to Latin America's stability?
Yes: Machinations with Iran, OPEC and FARC - no doubt about his goals
Monday, April 14, 2008
By Lawrence J. Haas
After Colombia bombed a Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia camp early this month, killing a key leader and 20 followers of the notorious terrorist group, Colombian officials said a computer they found at the site showed that FARC recently received $300 million from Venezuela's president, Hugo Chavez.
Chavez's lar-gesse, and his longstanding links to FARC which also came to light, explain his threatening behavior after the bombing, which included a strong denunciation of Colombian President Alvaro Uribe and threats to move 10,000 troops to Venezuela's border with Colombia.
Tensions have since eased among Colombia, Venezuela, and Ecuador, the nation where the raid occurred. But Chavez's bluster provides the latest evidence that the Venezuelan strongman presents a growing danger to regional peace and stability and a thorny challenge to the United States.
In the region, Chavez hopes to build a multinational counterweight to the United States and its allies by spreading his socialist vision, strengthening his ties to like-minded states such as Cuba, Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua and providing aid to terrorists that target Western interests.
More broadly, he is strengthening his ties to the outlaw regime of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, defending its pursuit of nuclear weapons, cutting business deals with Tehran and promising to use oil as a weapon if Washington confronts Tehran more aggressively.
Unfortunately, U.S. officials cannot agree on how to respond. President Bush promotes trade between the United States and key South American nations, such as Colombia, to strengthen U.S. ties to our allies and reduce chances that Chavez will coax any of them to his side.
Congress, however, won't pass the U.S.-Colombia Trade Partnership, citing lingering human-rights problems -- even though Uribe is making progress on human rights, reducing corruption, fighting terrorists and paramilitary forces and building a prosperous free-market economy.
In fact, the House recently voted to bolster Chavez's oil power by raising taxes on the largest U.S.-based oil companies while leaving others, including Venezuela's state-owned Citgo, exempt.
This will not do. Chavez is too great a danger to regional peace and stability to become an unlikely beneficiary of polarizing politics between a Republican president and a Democratic Congress.
The Venezuelan's ties to FARC date at least to 1992, when the group gave him $150,000 while he served prison time for an attempted coup, according to computers found at the bombed FARC site.
Investigators also found evidence that Chavez worked with FARC to destabilize Uribe's government and to build global legitimacy for the terrorist group, which specializes in launching attacks, massacring citizens, taking hostages, recruiting minors and trafficking in cocaine.
Were that not threatening enough to hemispheric peace, Chavez's "axis of unity" with Ahmadinejad -- as the leaders call their relationship in a retort to Bush's inclusion of Iran in his axis of evil -- adds another ingredient to the toxic stew. Their alliance gives Tehran, its terrorist minions and its anti-Western ideology a footprint by America's backdoor.
Iran's key terrorist client, Hezbollah, has worked in Latin American since the 1990s, using the tri-border area alongside Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina to launch some of the decade's most spectacular attacks against Jewish sites. Now, evidence suggests Hezbollah is growing its presence in Venezuela.
Chavez is also teaming with Ahmadinejad to make trouble for the United States in Iran's neck of the world. Late last year, the duo tried to persuade the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries not to price its oil in U.S. dollars anymore.
The Saudis shot down the idea, but failure did not humble Chavez. He predicted oil would hit $200 a barrel if the United States attacked Iran or Venezuela, making clear that he will remain a threat to hemispheric stability and a challenge to U.S. interests in this vital region.
Lawrence J. Haas is vice president of the Committee on the Present Danger. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
larry@larryhassonline.com
Below are dueling columns on the "threat" of Hugo Chavez to America.
See if you don't think that one seems more rationally based on facts and one is intended as political propaganda.
Why the difference??
- Uke Man
Mark Weisbrot: Is Chavez a threat to Latin America's stability?
No: Bush administration's anti-Venezuela policies have skewed the scene
Monday, April 14, 2008
By Mark Weisbrot
Of all the nonsense that we hear regularly about Venezuela, the idea that the country is a security threat is probably the most ridiculous.
For six years, since the Bush administration supported a failed coup against the democratically elected government of President Hugo Chavez, Washington has been sporadically accusing Venezuela of links to terrorism.
During those six years, the charges have been made by anonymous officials, and the U.S. government never produced supporting evidence. Now the Colombian government claims it has proof of the Chavez government's support for the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, commonly known as FARC, a guerrilla group that has been active for four decades. The evidence comes from documents alleged to have been found on laptops captured by the Colombian military in a cross-border bombing and incursion into neighboring Ecuador on March 1.
As with the allegations that led us into the Iraq war, there is less here than meets the eye. First, as The New York Times recently acknowledged, it is impossible to authenticate the files independently. And, even if some of the documents are real, there is nothing showing that Venezuela provided material aid to FARC.
For example, a claim that made headlines all over the world about Chavez supposedly providing $300 million to the guerrillas turned out to be based on a far-fetched interpretation of one alleged document.
Nonetheless, the Bush administration is investigating whether it should place Venezuela on a special list of "state sponsors of terrorism," which would imply at least some kind of economic sanctions. Some right-wing Republicans in the House of Representatives have come up with a similar effort in the form of a proposed resolution.
There will be more of this posturing, combined with wild accusations, because this is an election year. The past two presidential elections were determined by the votes of a few hundred thousand right-wing Cuban-Americans in Florida. These voters hate Venezuela, and we can expect that many politicians will pander to them. On the other hand, Venezuela is our fourth-largest oil supplier and a major importer of U.S. goods, and saner heads will take that into account.
The cheap political points scored by U.S. politicians come at a cost in the rest of the hemisphere. The Bush administration, which is attempting to isolate Venezuela, has accomplished the opposite: Washington is more isolated than ever in Latin America.
When Colombia invaded Ecuador, almost every country south of the Rio Grande condemned this violation of Ecuador's sovereignty, which was also widely seen as carried out with U.S. help or at least approval. When the ensuing political and diplomatic fight was settled -- with no help from Washington -- Ecuadorian President Lula da Silva of Brazil declared Chavez to be "the great peacemaker" in the conflict.
The same is true for the hostage problem in Colombia, where Chavez's efforts to mediate received widespread praise from Europe, Latin America and even the families of the U.S. military contractors held by FARC.
Everyone but U.S. officials in Washington appears to be interested in a negotiated solution to release the hostages held by FARC. When Venezuela mediated a release of hostages Dec. 31, representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador, France, and Switzerland were there. Washington was noticeably absent.
Washington has alienated Latin America through economic policy prescriptions, which are widely associated with Latin America's unprecedented long-term economic failure, through proposed free-trade agreements, which grow more unpopular every year and through the militaristic and failed war on drugs.
The Bush administration thinks it can turn this around by scapegoating Venezuela and hurling accusations of support for terrorism. It won't work; nobody in the region is buying it.
Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
weisbrot@cepr.net
Lawrence J. Haas: Is Chavez a threat to Latin America's stability?
Yes: Machinations with Iran, OPEC and FARC - no doubt about his goals
Monday, April 14, 2008
By Lawrence J. Haas
After Colombia bombed a Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia camp early this month, killing a key leader and 20 followers of the notorious terrorist group, Colombian officials said a computer they found at the site showed that FARC recently received $300 million from Venezuela's president, Hugo Chavez.
Chavez's lar-gesse, and his longstanding links to FARC which also came to light, explain his threatening behavior after the bombing, which included a strong denunciation of Colombian President Alvaro Uribe and threats to move 10,000 troops to Venezuela's border with Colombia.
Tensions have since eased among Colombia, Venezuela, and Ecuador, the nation where the raid occurred. But Chavez's bluster provides the latest evidence that the Venezuelan strongman presents a growing danger to regional peace and stability and a thorny challenge to the United States.
In the region, Chavez hopes to build a multinational counterweight to the United States and its allies by spreading his socialist vision, strengthening his ties to like-minded states such as Cuba, Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua and providing aid to terrorists that target Western interests.
More broadly, he is strengthening his ties to the outlaw regime of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, defending its pursuit of nuclear weapons, cutting business deals with Tehran and promising to use oil as a weapon if Washington confronts Tehran more aggressively.
Unfortunately, U.S. officials cannot agree on how to respond. President Bush promotes trade between the United States and key South American nations, such as Colombia, to strengthen U.S. ties to our allies and reduce chances that Chavez will coax any of them to his side.
Congress, however, won't pass the U.S.-Colombia Trade Partnership, citing lingering human-rights problems -- even though Uribe is making progress on human rights, reducing corruption, fighting terrorists and paramilitary forces and building a prosperous free-market economy.
In fact, the House recently voted to bolster Chavez's oil power by raising taxes on the largest U.S.-based oil companies while leaving others, including Venezuela's state-owned Citgo, exempt.
This will not do. Chavez is too great a danger to regional peace and stability to become an unlikely beneficiary of polarizing politics between a Republican president and a Democratic Congress.
The Venezuelan's ties to FARC date at least to 1992, when the group gave him $150,000 while he served prison time for an attempted coup, according to computers found at the bombed FARC site.
Investigators also found evidence that Chavez worked with FARC to destabilize Uribe's government and to build global legitimacy for the terrorist group, which specializes in launching attacks, massacring citizens, taking hostages, recruiting minors and trafficking in cocaine.
Were that not threatening enough to hemispheric peace, Chavez's "axis of unity" with Ahmadinejad -- as the leaders call their relationship in a retort to Bush's inclusion of Iran in his axis of evil -- adds another ingredient to the toxic stew. Their alliance gives Tehran, its terrorist minions and its anti-Western ideology a footprint by America's backdoor.
Iran's key terrorist client, Hezbollah, has worked in Latin American since the 1990s, using the tri-border area alongside Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina to launch some of the decade's most spectacular attacks against Jewish sites. Now, evidence suggests Hezbollah is growing its presence in Venezuela.
Chavez is also teaming with Ahmadinejad to make trouble for the United States in Iran's neck of the world. Late last year, the duo tried to persuade the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries not to price its oil in U.S. dollars anymore.
The Saudis shot down the idea, but failure did not humble Chavez. He predicted oil would hit $200 a barrel if the United States attacked Iran or Venezuela, making clear that he will remain a threat to hemispheric stability and a challenge to U.S. interests in this vital region.
Lawrence J. Haas is vice president of the Committee on the Present Danger. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
larry@larryhassonline.com
Thursday, April 24, 2008
Foxx racist gets straightened out by a feisty priest
Hey Folks -
The whole "Rev. Wright / elite / bowling" thing with Obama is just pure racism. The Fuxx reporter in this video is an excellent example of it.
This election will definitively determine how far we have ACTUALLY come since Jim Crow. We've progressed, no doubt, but not as far as a lot of racist folks claim.
- Uke Man
The whole "Rev. Wright / elite / bowling" thing with Obama is just pure racism. The Fuxx reporter in this video is an excellent example of it.
This election will definitively determine how far we have ACTUALLY come since Jim Crow. We've progressed, no doubt, but not as far as a lot of racist folks claim.
- Uke Man
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
A Must-See-Listen Video - jazzy too
Hey Folks -
One more look at the first night of the Ukulele Caravan.
The dopey Uke Man "filmed" this song, holding the camera, zooming, etc.; but never hit the "record" button.
We are saved, though, because my pal Jason Tagg (the younger and more awake maestro of Midnight Ukulele Disco) DID film it.
Go to: http://ukuleledisco.com/daydreamduo
Patsy Monteleone and Khabu provide a most dreamy and pleasant version of "Day Dream."
- Uke Man
One more look at the first night of the Ukulele Caravan.
The dopey Uke Man "filmed" this song, holding the camera, zooming, etc.; but never hit the "record" button.
We are saved, though, because my pal Jason Tagg (the younger and more awake maestro of Midnight Ukulele Disco) DID film it.
Go to: http://ukuleledisco.com/daydreamduo
Patsy Monteleone and Khabu provide a most dreamy and pleasant version of "Day Dream."
- Uke Man
Monday, April 21, 2008
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Now even ABC agrees with the Uke Man
Hey Folks -
Don't believe the Uke Man's constant complaining about the rich getting richer while the rest of us go down the tubes??
Well, check this out from the "mainstream" media:
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=7473406&ch=4226720&src=news
Sorry about the commercial you have to wait through.
- Uke Man
Don't believe the Uke Man's constant complaining about the rich getting richer while the rest of us go down the tubes??
Well, check this out from the "mainstream" media:
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=7473406&ch=4226720&src=news
Sorry about the commercial you have to wait through.
- Uke Man
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Khabu really DOES do Thelonious Monk this time!!
Hey Folks -
The Uke Man plays ukulele. I DO like all kinds of music, and jazz is included in that. Unfortunately, while I am great at appreciation, I'm not as familiar with artists and their catalog as I'd like.
A few postings below I labeled a tune played by Khabu as being a Monk number. A commenter let me know my mistake.
I hope I have it right now.
- Uke Man
Friday, April 18, 2008
"Let them eat mud"
Folks -
How fucking sad!!
But what can we expect from Capitalism where profit trumps people and corrupt greed-heads stuff their pockets at the world's expense?
Someday we may be able to enjoy "McMud Burgers" right here in the "greatest nation the world has ever known" (the one with God on its side).
- Uke Man
PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti — Hunger bashed in the front gate of Haiti’s presidential palace. Hunger poured onto the streets, burning tires and taking on soldiers and the police. Hunger sent the country’s prime minister packing.
Haiti’s hunger, that burn in the belly that so many here feel, has become fiercer than ever in recent days as global food prices spiral out of reach, spiking as much as 45 percent since the end of 2006 and turning Haitian staples like beans, corn and rice into closely guarded treasures.
Saint Louis Meriska’s children ate two spoonfuls of rice apiece as their only meal recently and then went without any food the following day. His eyes downcast, his own stomach empty, the unemployed father said forlornly, “They look at me and say, ‘Papa, I’m hungry,’ and I have to look away. It’s humiliating and it makes you angry.”
That anger is palpable across the globe. The food crisis is not only being felt among the poor but is also eroding the gains of the working and middle classes, sowing volatile levels of discontent and putting new pressures on fragile governments.
In Cairo, the military is being put to work baking bread as rising food prices threaten to become the spark that ignites wider anger at a repressive government. In Burkina Faso and other parts of sub-Saharan Africa, food riots are breaking out as never before. In reasonably prosperous Malaysia, the ruling coalition was nearly ousted by voters who cited food and fuel price increases as their main concerns.
“It’s the worst crisis of its kind in more than 30 years,” said Jeffrey D. Sachs, the economist and special adviser to the United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki-moon. “It’s a big deal and it’s obviously threatening a lot of governments. There are a number of governments on the ropes, and I think there’s more political fallout to come.”
Indeed, as it roils developing nations, the spike in commodity prices — the biggest since the Nixon administration — has pitted the globe’s poorer south against the relatively wealthy north, adding to demands for reform of rich nations’ farm and environmental policies. But experts say there are few quick fixes to a crisis tied to so many factors, from strong demand for food from emerging economies like China’s to rising oil prices to the diversion of food resources to make biofuels.
There are no scripts on how to handle the crisis, either. In Asia, governments are putting in place measures to limit hoarding of rice after some shoppers panicked at price increases and bought up everything they could.
Even in Thailand, which produces 10 million more tons of rice than it consumes and is the world’s largest rice exporter, supermarkets have placed signs limiting the amount of rice shoppers are allowed to purchase.
But there is also plenty of nervousness and confusion about how best to proceed and just how bad the impact may ultimately be, particularly as already strapped governments struggle to keep up their food subsidies.
‘Scandalous Storm’
“This is a perfect storm,” President Elías Antonio Saca of El Salvador said Wednesday at the World Economic Forum on Latin America in Cancún, Mexico. “How long can we withstand the situation? We have to feed our people, and commodities are becoming scarce. This scandalous storm might become a hurricane that could upset not only our economies but also the stability of our countries.”
In Asia, if Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi of Malaysia steps down, which is looking increasingly likely amid postelection turmoil within his party, he may be that region’s first high- profile political casualty of fuel and food price inflation.
In Indonesia, fearing protests, the government recently revised its 2008 budget, increasing the amount it will spend on food subsidies by about $280 million.
“The biggest concern is food riots,” said H.S. Dillon, a former adviser to Indonesia’s Ministry of Agriculture. Referring to small but widespread protests touched off by a rise in soybean prices in January, he said, “It has happened in the past and can happen again.”
Last month in Senegal, one of Africa’s oldest and most stable democracies, police in riot gear beat and used tear gas against people protesting high food prices and later raided a television station that broadcast images of the event. Many Senegalese have expressed anger at President Abdoulaye Wade for spending lavishly on roads and five-star hotels for an Islamic summit meeting last month while many people are unable to afford rice or fish.
“Why are these riots happening?” asked Arif Husain, senior food security analyst at the World Food Program, which has issued urgent appeals for donations. “The human instinct is to survive, and people are going to do no matter what to survive. And if you’re hungry you get angry quicker.”
Leaders who ignore the rage do so at their own risk. President René Préval of Haiti appeared to taunt the populace as the chorus of complaints about la vie chère — the expensive life — grew. He said if Haitians could afford cellphones, which many do carry, they should be able to feed their families. “If there is a protest against the rising prices,” he said, “come get me at the palace and I will demonstrate with you.”
When they came, filled with rage and by the thousands, he huddled inside and his presidential guards, with United Nations peacekeeping troops, rebuffed them. Within days, opposition lawmakers had voted out Mr. Préval’s prime minister, Jacques-Édouard Alexis, forcing him to reconstitute his government. Fragile in even the best of times, Haiti’s population and politics are now both simmering.
“Why were we surprised?” asked Patrick Élie, a Haitian political activist who followed the food riots in Africa earlier in the year and feared they might come to Haiti. “When something is coming your way all the way from Burkina Faso you should see it coming. What we had was like a can of gasoline that the government left for someone to light a match to it.”
Dwindling Menus
The rising prices are altering menus, and not for the better. In India, people are scrimping on milk for their children. Daily bowls of dal are getting thinner, as a bag of lentils is stretched across a few more meals.
Maninder Chand, an auto-rickshaw driver in New Delhi, said his family had given up eating meat altogether for the last several weeks.
Another rickshaw driver, Ravinder Kumar Gupta, said his wife had stopped seasoning their daily lentils, their chief source of protein, with the usual onion and spices because the price of cooking oil was now out of reach. These days, they eat bowls of watery, tasteless dal, seasoned only with salt.
Down Cairo’s Hafziyah Street, peddlers selling food from behind wood carts bark out their prices. But few customers can afford their fish or chicken, which bake in the hot sun. Food prices have doubled in two months.
Ahmed Abul Gheit, 25, sat on a cheap, stained wooden chair by his own pile of rotting tomatoes. “We can’t even find food,” he said, looking over at his friend Sobhy Abdullah, 50. Then raising his hands toward the sky, as if in prayer, he said, “May God take the guy I have in mind.”
Mr. Abdullah nodded, knowing full well that the “guy” was President Hosni Mubarak.
The government’s ability to address the crisis is limited, however. It already spends more on subsidies, including gasoline and bread, than on education and health combined.
“If all the people rise, then the government will resolve this,” said Raisa Fikry, 50, whose husband receives a pension equal to about $83 a month, as she shopped for vegetables. “But everyone has to rise together. People get scared. But we will all have to rise together.”
It is the kind of talk that has prompted the government to treat its economic woes as a security threat, dispatching riot forces with a strict warning that anyone who takes to the streets will be dealt with harshly.
Niger does not need to be reminded that hungry citizens overthrow governments. The country’s first postcolonial president, Hamani Diori, was toppled amid allegations of rampant corruption in 1974 as millions starved during a drought.
More recently, in 2005, it was mass protests in Niamey, the Nigerien capital, that made the government sit up and take notice of that year’s food crisis, which was caused by a complex mix of poor rains, locust infestation and market manipulation by traders.
“As a result of that experience the government created a cabinet-level ministry to deal with the high cost of living,” said Moustapha Kadi, an activist who helped organize marches in 2005. “So when prices went up this year the government acted quickly to remove tariffs on rice, which everyone eats. That quick action has kept people from taking to the streets.”
The Poor Eat Mud
In Haiti, where three-quarters of the population earns less than $2 a day and one in five children is chronically malnourished, the one business booming amid all the gloom is the selling of patties made of mud, oil and sugar, typically consumed only by the most destitute.
“It’s salty and it has butter and you don’t know you’re eating dirt,” said Olwich Louis Jeune, 24, who has taken to eating them more often in recent months. “It makes your stomach quiet down.”
But the grumbling in Haiti these days is no longer confined to the stomach. It is now spray-painted on walls of the capital and shouted by demonstrators.
In recent days, Mr. Préval has patched together a response, using international aid money and price reductions by importers to cut the price of a sack of rice by about 15 percent. He has also trimmed the salaries of some top officials. But those are considered temporary measures.
Real solutions will take years. Haiti, its agriculture industry in shambles, needs to better feed itself. Outside investment is the key, although that requires stability, not the sort of widespread looting and violence that the Haitian food riots have fostered.
Meanwhile, most of the poorest of the poor suffer silently, too weak for activism or too busy raising the next generation of hungry. In the sprawling slum of Haiti’s Cité Soleil, Placide Simone, 29, offered one of her five offspring to a stranger. “Take one,” she said, cradling a listless baby and motioning toward four rail-thin toddlers, none of whom had eaten that day. “You pick. Just feed them.”
How fucking sad!!
But what can we expect from Capitalism where profit trumps people and corrupt greed-heads stuff their pockets at the world's expense?
Someday we may be able to enjoy "McMud Burgers" right here in the "greatest nation the world has ever known" (the one with God on its side).
- Uke Man
PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti — Hunger bashed in the front gate of Haiti’s presidential palace. Hunger poured onto the streets, burning tires and taking on soldiers and the police. Hunger sent the country’s prime minister packing.
Haiti’s hunger, that burn in the belly that so many here feel, has become fiercer than ever in recent days as global food prices spiral out of reach, spiking as much as 45 percent since the end of 2006 and turning Haitian staples like beans, corn and rice into closely guarded treasures.
Saint Louis Meriska’s children ate two spoonfuls of rice apiece as their only meal recently and then went without any food the following day. His eyes downcast, his own stomach empty, the unemployed father said forlornly, “They look at me and say, ‘Papa, I’m hungry,’ and I have to look away. It’s humiliating and it makes you angry.”
That anger is palpable across the globe. The food crisis is not only being felt among the poor but is also eroding the gains of the working and middle classes, sowing volatile levels of discontent and putting new pressures on fragile governments.
In Cairo, the military is being put to work baking bread as rising food prices threaten to become the spark that ignites wider anger at a repressive government. In Burkina Faso and other parts of sub-Saharan Africa, food riots are breaking out as never before. In reasonably prosperous Malaysia, the ruling coalition was nearly ousted by voters who cited food and fuel price increases as their main concerns.
“It’s the worst crisis of its kind in more than 30 years,” said Jeffrey D. Sachs, the economist and special adviser to the United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki-moon. “It’s a big deal and it’s obviously threatening a lot of governments. There are a number of governments on the ropes, and I think there’s more political fallout to come.”
Indeed, as it roils developing nations, the spike in commodity prices — the biggest since the Nixon administration — has pitted the globe’s poorer south against the relatively wealthy north, adding to demands for reform of rich nations’ farm and environmental policies. But experts say there are few quick fixes to a crisis tied to so many factors, from strong demand for food from emerging economies like China’s to rising oil prices to the diversion of food resources to make biofuels.
There are no scripts on how to handle the crisis, either. In Asia, governments are putting in place measures to limit hoarding of rice after some shoppers panicked at price increases and bought up everything they could.
Even in Thailand, which produces 10 million more tons of rice than it consumes and is the world’s largest rice exporter, supermarkets have placed signs limiting the amount of rice shoppers are allowed to purchase.
But there is also plenty of nervousness and confusion about how best to proceed and just how bad the impact may ultimately be, particularly as already strapped governments struggle to keep up their food subsidies.
‘Scandalous Storm’
“This is a perfect storm,” President Elías Antonio Saca of El Salvador said Wednesday at the World Economic Forum on Latin America in Cancún, Mexico. “How long can we withstand the situation? We have to feed our people, and commodities are becoming scarce. This scandalous storm might become a hurricane that could upset not only our economies but also the stability of our countries.”
In Asia, if Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi of Malaysia steps down, which is looking increasingly likely amid postelection turmoil within his party, he may be that region’s first high- profile political casualty of fuel and food price inflation.
In Indonesia, fearing protests, the government recently revised its 2008 budget, increasing the amount it will spend on food subsidies by about $280 million.
“The biggest concern is food riots,” said H.S. Dillon, a former adviser to Indonesia’s Ministry of Agriculture. Referring to small but widespread protests touched off by a rise in soybean prices in January, he said, “It has happened in the past and can happen again.”
Last month in Senegal, one of Africa’s oldest and most stable democracies, police in riot gear beat and used tear gas against people protesting high food prices and later raided a television station that broadcast images of the event. Many Senegalese have expressed anger at President Abdoulaye Wade for spending lavishly on roads and five-star hotels for an Islamic summit meeting last month while many people are unable to afford rice or fish.
“Why are these riots happening?” asked Arif Husain, senior food security analyst at the World Food Program, which has issued urgent appeals for donations. “The human instinct is to survive, and people are going to do no matter what to survive. And if you’re hungry you get angry quicker.”
Leaders who ignore the rage do so at their own risk. President René Préval of Haiti appeared to taunt the populace as the chorus of complaints about la vie chère — the expensive life — grew. He said if Haitians could afford cellphones, which many do carry, they should be able to feed their families. “If there is a protest against the rising prices,” he said, “come get me at the palace and I will demonstrate with you.”
When they came, filled with rage and by the thousands, he huddled inside and his presidential guards, with United Nations peacekeeping troops, rebuffed them. Within days, opposition lawmakers had voted out Mr. Préval’s prime minister, Jacques-Édouard Alexis, forcing him to reconstitute his government. Fragile in even the best of times, Haiti’s population and politics are now both simmering.
“Why were we surprised?” asked Patrick Élie, a Haitian political activist who followed the food riots in Africa earlier in the year and feared they might come to Haiti. “When something is coming your way all the way from Burkina Faso you should see it coming. What we had was like a can of gasoline that the government left for someone to light a match to it.”
Dwindling Menus
The rising prices are altering menus, and not for the better. In India, people are scrimping on milk for their children. Daily bowls of dal are getting thinner, as a bag of lentils is stretched across a few more meals.
Maninder Chand, an auto-rickshaw driver in New Delhi, said his family had given up eating meat altogether for the last several weeks.
Another rickshaw driver, Ravinder Kumar Gupta, said his wife had stopped seasoning their daily lentils, their chief source of protein, with the usual onion and spices because the price of cooking oil was now out of reach. These days, they eat bowls of watery, tasteless dal, seasoned only with salt.
Down Cairo’s Hafziyah Street, peddlers selling food from behind wood carts bark out their prices. But few customers can afford their fish or chicken, which bake in the hot sun. Food prices have doubled in two months.
Ahmed Abul Gheit, 25, sat on a cheap, stained wooden chair by his own pile of rotting tomatoes. “We can’t even find food,” he said, looking over at his friend Sobhy Abdullah, 50. Then raising his hands toward the sky, as if in prayer, he said, “May God take the guy I have in mind.”
Mr. Abdullah nodded, knowing full well that the “guy” was President Hosni Mubarak.
The government’s ability to address the crisis is limited, however. It already spends more on subsidies, including gasoline and bread, than on education and health combined.
“If all the people rise, then the government will resolve this,” said Raisa Fikry, 50, whose husband receives a pension equal to about $83 a month, as she shopped for vegetables. “But everyone has to rise together. People get scared. But we will all have to rise together.”
It is the kind of talk that has prompted the government to treat its economic woes as a security threat, dispatching riot forces with a strict warning that anyone who takes to the streets will be dealt with harshly.
Niger does not need to be reminded that hungry citizens overthrow governments. The country’s first postcolonial president, Hamani Diori, was toppled amid allegations of rampant corruption in 1974 as millions starved during a drought.
More recently, in 2005, it was mass protests in Niamey, the Nigerien capital, that made the government sit up and take notice of that year’s food crisis, which was caused by a complex mix of poor rains, locust infestation and market manipulation by traders.
“As a result of that experience the government created a cabinet-level ministry to deal with the high cost of living,” said Moustapha Kadi, an activist who helped organize marches in 2005. “So when prices went up this year the government acted quickly to remove tariffs on rice, which everyone eats. That quick action has kept people from taking to the streets.”
The Poor Eat Mud
In Haiti, where three-quarters of the population earns less than $2 a day and one in five children is chronically malnourished, the one business booming amid all the gloom is the selling of patties made of mud, oil and sugar, typically consumed only by the most destitute.
“It’s salty and it has butter and you don’t know you’re eating dirt,” said Olwich Louis Jeune, 24, who has taken to eating them more often in recent months. “It makes your stomach quiet down.”
But the grumbling in Haiti these days is no longer confined to the stomach. It is now spray-painted on walls of the capital and shouted by demonstrators.
In recent days, Mr. Préval has patched together a response, using international aid money and price reductions by importers to cut the price of a sack of rice by about 15 percent. He has also trimmed the salaries of some top officials. But those are considered temporary measures.
Real solutions will take years. Haiti, its agriculture industry in shambles, needs to better feed itself. Outside investment is the key, although that requires stability, not the sort of widespread looting and violence that the Haitian food riots have fostered.
Meanwhile, most of the poorest of the poor suffer silently, too weak for activism or too busy raising the next generation of hungry. In the sprawling slum of Haiti’s Cité Soleil, Placide Simone, 29, offered one of her five offspring to a stranger. “Take one,” she said, cradling a listless baby and motioning toward four rail-thin toddlers, none of whom had eaten that day. “You pick. Just feed them.”
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Bitter?
“We are often told that the poor are grateful for charity. Some of them are, no doubt, but the best amongst the poor are never grateful.They are ungrateful, discontented, disobedient,and rebellious. They are quite right to be so. . .
As for the virtuous poor, one can pity them, of course, but one cannot possibly admire them.”
- - - - - - - - - - - Oscar Wilde
Hey Folks -
Bitter??
You bet your ass I’m bitter!! And anyone in the bottom 90% 0f the American populace who isn’t bitter can be pitied, of course, but one cannot possibly admire them.
Read Free Lunch by David Cay Johnston and tell me you aren’t bitter. In this country (and three others: Russia, Brazil, and Mexico) the super rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer, and the middle class is sinking into poverty.
Johnston writes: “This growing concentration of income at the top is nothing like the distribution of income America experienced in the first three decades following World War II. Nor is it like that found in Canada, Europe [remember those evil Frenchmen?], Japan, Australia, and New Zealand.” According to Johnston, the average income of the bottom 90% of Americans is $29,000 per year, and “the vast majority has to get by on about $75 less each week than it did a generation earlier, tax return data show.”
Why is Obama raking in so much shit about his “bitter” statement? It’s supposedly because he sees himself as an “elite,” because he’s condescending toward and out of touch with regular folks, because he supposedly said people were religious, pro-gun, or xenophobic only because they were bitter over the behavior of government.
This is all crap.
Obama is being demonized for telling the truth. The truth of lesser importance (in explaining the reaction to his words) is that difficult times lead to religious revival, upsurges in “rugged individualism” (often associated with guns), and xenophobic scapegoating. Of course, many people have been steadfastly religious, gun-toting, and/or bigoted for many years, through good times and bad. Pretending that Obama doesn’t realize these differences is self-serving nonsense.
These specious arguments do not explain the establishment’s anger with Obama. They are simply the best hope of distracting the duller among us from the more crucial reality, the reality that the vast majority SHOULD be bitter for their exploitation by the top 10%.
For some time I have been asserting here that everything is presented to us from the perspective of those 10% on top. No recession existed until the big boys got bitten. Everything was looking good – especially the labor market - until the stock market got hit. Losing ones home to foreclosure didn’t merit government help – unless you were Bear Sterns.
It flies in the face of the official dogma, but people OUGHT to be bitter!!
So, are they? Yeah, sure, many are, but we don’t hear much about it. We’re not supposed to. Reality is not helpful to maintaining the dominant order. The truth is revolutionary. Just as the poor who ARE poor as a result of the system into which they are born are supposed to be thankful for the crumbs thrown their way by those who keep them in their degraded state; we are supposed to be thankful for our degradation. It should be enough that McCain and Clinton and the talking heads tell us we are self-reliant, resilient and can compete with anyone. Yeah!!! They like us!! It’s morning in America (just get "re-trained") !!
What shit!!
But, to the actual elite, the top 1%, it's IMPORTANT shit. If too many of us get a true picture, too many of us might go to the window and scream, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it any more.” That could upset some apple carts.
Bitter?? You bet!! And most of us OUGHT to be bitter.
In my opinion, every election is an IQ test. We shall see whether Americans are smart enough to see and admit the truth and act upon it, or whether we can be distracted from the truth by distortions and disingenuous flattery.
- Uke Man
As for the virtuous poor, one can pity them, of course, but one cannot possibly admire them.”
- - - - - - - - - - - Oscar Wilde
Hey Folks -
Bitter??
You bet your ass I’m bitter!! And anyone in the bottom 90% 0f the American populace who isn’t bitter can be pitied, of course, but one cannot possibly admire them.
Read Free Lunch by David Cay Johnston and tell me you aren’t bitter. In this country (and three others: Russia, Brazil, and Mexico) the super rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer, and the middle class is sinking into poverty.
Johnston writes: “This growing concentration of income at the top is nothing like the distribution of income America experienced in the first three decades following World War II. Nor is it like that found in Canada, Europe [remember those evil Frenchmen?], Japan, Australia, and New Zealand.” According to Johnston, the average income of the bottom 90% of Americans is $29,000 per year, and “the vast majority has to get by on about $75 less each week than it did a generation earlier, tax return data show.”
Why is Obama raking in so much shit about his “bitter” statement? It’s supposedly because he sees himself as an “elite,” because he’s condescending toward and out of touch with regular folks, because he supposedly said people were religious, pro-gun, or xenophobic only because they were bitter over the behavior of government.
This is all crap.
Obama is being demonized for telling the truth. The truth of lesser importance (in explaining the reaction to his words) is that difficult times lead to religious revival, upsurges in “rugged individualism” (often associated with guns), and xenophobic scapegoating. Of course, many people have been steadfastly religious, gun-toting, and/or bigoted for many years, through good times and bad. Pretending that Obama doesn’t realize these differences is self-serving nonsense.
These specious arguments do not explain the establishment’s anger with Obama. They are simply the best hope of distracting the duller among us from the more crucial reality, the reality that the vast majority SHOULD be bitter for their exploitation by the top 10%.
For some time I have been asserting here that everything is presented to us from the perspective of those 10% on top. No recession existed until the big boys got bitten. Everything was looking good – especially the labor market - until the stock market got hit. Losing ones home to foreclosure didn’t merit government help – unless you were Bear Sterns.
It flies in the face of the official dogma, but people OUGHT to be bitter!!
So, are they? Yeah, sure, many are, but we don’t hear much about it. We’re not supposed to. Reality is not helpful to maintaining the dominant order. The truth is revolutionary. Just as the poor who ARE poor as a result of the system into which they are born are supposed to be thankful for the crumbs thrown their way by those who keep them in their degraded state; we are supposed to be thankful for our degradation. It should be enough that McCain and Clinton and the talking heads tell us we are self-reliant, resilient and can compete with anyone. Yeah!!! They like us!! It’s morning in America (just get "re-trained") !!
What shit!!
But, to the actual elite, the top 1%, it's IMPORTANT shit. If too many of us get a true picture, too many of us might go to the window and scream, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it any more.” That could upset some apple carts.
Bitter?? You bet!! And most of us OUGHT to be bitter.
In my opinion, every election is an IQ test. We shall see whether Americans are smart enough to see and admit the truth and act upon it, or whether we can be distracted from the truth by distortions and disingenuous flattery.
- Uke Man
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Uke Man on Midnight Ukulele Disco !!!
Hey Folks -
During Ukulele Caravan I was behind my camera, so - while I filmed a lot of my friends - I didn't (so to speak) shoot myself.
However, Jason Tagg of Sonic Uke, Ukulele Cabaret, and Midnight Ukulele Disco did shoot me!!
My last night on the coast I was a guest on Jason's Midnight Ukulele Disco show where I performed one song live - besides helping out on the show's theme song - and where Jason aired six songs filmed during our travels as the Ukulele Caravan.
Check it out at:
http://ukuleledisco.com/tomcomplete
- Uke Man
During Ukulele Caravan I was behind my camera, so - while I filmed a lot of my friends - I didn't (so to speak) shoot myself.
However, Jason Tagg of Sonic Uke, Ukulele Cabaret, and Midnight Ukulele Disco did shoot me!!
My last night on the coast I was a guest on Jason's Midnight Ukulele Disco show where I performed one song live - besides helping out on the show's theme song - and where Jason aired six songs filmed during our travels as the Ukulele Caravan.
Check it out at:
http://ukuleledisco.com/tomcomplete
- Uke Man
Monday, April 14, 2008
Sunday, April 13, 2008
Saturday, April 12, 2008
Friday, April 11, 2008
Thursday, April 10, 2008
CNN / Certified Nutcase News
Hey Folks –
The Uke Man is back from the “Ukulele Caravan” tour. It was FANTASTIC !!
I’m recovering and catching up – I will have some videos and stills at some point – gotta let the muscles, joints, and brain decompress a bit before I get back up to speed. For now, here’s a comment:
At the end of the tour and visiting with my friends Ron and Quincy, I made my way to the Newark, New Jersey airport, wormed through the TSA checkpoint, and plopped down in the vinyl seat at Gate 109a. CNN was on the unavoidable big-screen TV.
The earnest talking heads were going on and on and on about something. The banner at the screen’s bottom announced that whatever it was it was going on RIGHT THEN!!!!
As I was gradually drawn into the “excitement” it appeared to be something like the OJ car “chase” – whoopee!! “China” kept being mentioned – then “THE TORCH”!!! Oh, my Dog!!! Someone was threatening THE TORCH!!!
It seems it was in San Francisco and of such importance that the police were changing routs and CNN was providing continuous coverage, prattling on about “human rights” and the “political” ramifications, etc., etc., etc.
Retch!!
There it was: extravagant coverage of a dispute between a Capitalist dictatorship ("Communist" China) and the displaced elites of an exploitative feudal system (Tibet) - made out to be of earth-shaking, dramatic consequence. Yet, a while back when Ukuleles for Sanity joined thousands to protest George Bush and the Republican National Convention in New York City (where I had just spent a week), the media yawned.
What crap!
You decide. Which is more important?? The havoc Duhbya has wrought? or the fucking Olympic Torch? The war or the ascendancy of the Dali Lama?
The media can't solve our problems. They serve the problems.
- Uke Man
The Uke Man is back from the “Ukulele Caravan” tour. It was FANTASTIC !!
I’m recovering and catching up – I will have some videos and stills at some point – gotta let the muscles, joints, and brain decompress a bit before I get back up to speed. For now, here’s a comment:
At the end of the tour and visiting with my friends Ron and Quincy, I made my way to the Newark, New Jersey airport, wormed through the TSA checkpoint, and plopped down in the vinyl seat at Gate 109a. CNN was on the unavoidable big-screen TV.
The earnest talking heads were going on and on and on about something. The banner at the screen’s bottom announced that whatever it was it was going on RIGHT THEN!!!!
As I was gradually drawn into the “excitement” it appeared to be something like the OJ car “chase” – whoopee!! “China” kept being mentioned – then “THE TORCH”!!! Oh, my Dog!!! Someone was threatening THE TORCH!!!
It seems it was in San Francisco and of such importance that the police were changing routs and CNN was providing continuous coverage, prattling on about “human rights” and the “political” ramifications, etc., etc., etc.
Retch!!
There it was: extravagant coverage of a dispute between a Capitalist dictatorship ("Communist" China) and the displaced elites of an exploitative feudal system (Tibet) - made out to be of earth-shaking, dramatic consequence. Yet, a while back when Ukuleles for Sanity joined thousands to protest George Bush and the Republican National Convention in New York City (where I had just spent a week), the media yawned.
What crap!
You decide. Which is more important?? The havoc Duhbya has wrought? or the fucking Olympic Torch? The war or the ascendancy of the Dali Lama?
The media can't solve our problems. They serve the problems.
- Uke Man
Tuesday, April 01, 2008
A Song for the Vampires that run the World (for the time being)
Hey Folks -
Here's "Kiss Me Son of God" - a song written by They Might Be Giants and with two extra verses written by the Uke Man: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szila-3QEjY
This should be played in schools every day - right after the Pledge of Allegiance (see postings directly below).
- Uke Man
Here's "Kiss Me Son of God" - a song written by They Might Be Giants and with two extra verses written by the Uke Man: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szila-3QEjY
This should be played in schools every day - right after the Pledge of Allegiance (see postings directly below).
- Uke Man
The Invisible Hand be Damned
Hey Folks -
Robyn Blumner's column speaks for itself, but I can't resist putting in my two cents worth.
When she says, "Socialized risk is what this is called. Heads, they win; tails, we lose," she has it right, but it's not just the case in the present circumstances! It is the long-standing goal and practice of the Vampires in control of what goes down in this country and world.
When she says:
"What I can't get out of my head is the way we've been suckered again into believing the malarkey sold by Milton Friedman, Ronald Reagan, Alan Greenspan and a long list of conservative think tanks, that the market is our savior. It is so convenient to make government the bad guy, the one who interferes with everyone's pot of gold, and make open markets the answer to what ails, as Reagan did so often. But the historical reality is that the free market has a dark side that causes social displacement and instability, and by its nature it is an uncaring thing," (emphasis mine)
she has it EXACTLY right!!!
One can't go a day without someone praising the Market as if it were a god!! Well, fuck the Market, and now, with the latest reality therapy the imbecilic president/emperor has unintentionally inflicted on the economic lives of the People, maybe a few more of us will spit on the sycophants who demand we kneel and worship the Market and its "invisible hand"!!
- Uke Man
Free-market government? Bah!
Monday, March 31, 2008
By Robyn Blumner
If you had any doubts that our nation's financial overseers are working for those with wealth, the evidence was on full display when the Federal Reserve rode to the rescue of Wall Street. While families facing foreclosure are told by Washington (and Sen. John McCain) to try to renegotiate terms with their mortgage holder -- if they can figure out who that is -- those in the private-investment world who raked in wild riches by taking irresponsible risks are being bailed out of their liquidity crisis by the taxpayers.
All those billions of dollars in subprime-mortgage-backed securities that the investment houses can't borrow against because they are considered toxic are now being accepted by the Fed, an independent government agency, as collateral for upward of hundreds of billions of dollars in emergency loans.
I understand that economic disaster may have ensued had Bear Stearns simply been allowed to go bankrupt and had the machers in the investment world been left trying to pawn their collateralized securities for what they could get. But what a sweet gig it is to be a member of the master-of-the-universe class. First, you are awash in money created by risk-laden investments that disregard all warning signs; meanwhile, the rest of working America lives with stagnating wages even as the economy expands. When all those investments collapse, you are considered too big to fail and the government swoops in to keep you afloat.
Socialized risk is what this is called. Heads, they win; tails, we lose.
If this credit crunch and the pain to come teaches us anything, it is that when the market is allowed to operate without supervision and regulation, insuperable greed will overcome rational, prudent behavior. Josef Ackermann, chief executive of Deutsche Bank, said it straight out in a speech this month, "I no longer believe in the market's self-healing power."
He's in good company. Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and numerous other Wall Street titans don't believe in it either, turning instead to the central bank for a handout to cover their bad bets. They should know that by bellying up to the discount window, where they can borrow money previously available only to the regulated commercial banking industry, the "leave us alone" days of the private investment banks are over. No justification for regulators keeping hands off exists any longer.
What I can't get out of my head is the way we've been suckered again into believing the malarkey sold by Milton Friedman, Ronald Reagan, Alan Greenspan and a long list of conservative think tanks, that the market is our savior. It is so convenient to make government the bad guy, the one who interferes with everyone's pot of gold, and make open markets the answer to what ails, as Reagan did so often. But the historical reality is that the free market has a dark side that causes social displacement and instability, and by its nature it is an uncaring thing.
The free market does not raise an eyebrow when investor obsession with short-term profits results in outsourcing for cheap, exploitable labor overseas and the abandonment of health benefits or pensions for whatever American employees remain. Rather, it cheers.
The market is not the best part of America. Not even close. Our government is the best part -- or at least it used to be, before the current gang took over.
Ultimately, it is government that defines who we are and lays out a path for how our society will be. The market wouldn't have built a uniform system of roads and bridges or provided free public education. It wouldn't have guaranteed minimum wages or insisted on safe workplaces. Economists who claim that the market would have filled these gaps are not students of history. And without the government's backstop of depositor money, we would still have bank runs.
But somewhere along the way, we started to buy Reagan's line that the 10 most dangerous words are, Hi, I'm from the government, and I'm here to help. Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers didn't think those words were so scary.
Reagan and his ideological partners steered us wrong. They convinced the middle class to mistrust the only friend it has that is bigger than the free-market bully.
Only government can reset the scales and make this country a fair place again, where you don't have to be a master-of-the-universe-class member to know that you can afford college for your kids and a decent retirement for yourself. When the government stopped helping the middle class, the prosperity of this land stopped getting shared.
So after the government's done rescuing Wall Street, the rest of us could use some kind attention, too. But we'd need a different government for that -- a very different government.
Robyn Blumner writes for Tribune Media Services.
blumner@sptimes.com
Robyn Blumner's column speaks for itself, but I can't resist putting in my two cents worth.
When she says, "Socialized risk is what this is called. Heads, they win; tails, we lose," she has it right, but it's not just the case in the present circumstances! It is the long-standing goal and practice of the Vampires in control of what goes down in this country and world.
When she says:
"What I can't get out of my head is the way we've been suckered again into believing the malarkey sold by Milton Friedman, Ronald Reagan, Alan Greenspan and a long list of conservative think tanks, that the market is our savior. It is so convenient to make government the bad guy, the one who interferes with everyone's pot of gold, and make open markets the answer to what ails, as Reagan did so often. But the historical reality is that the free market has a dark side that causes social displacement and instability, and by its nature it is an uncaring thing," (emphasis mine)
she has it EXACTLY right!!!
One can't go a day without someone praising the Market as if it were a god!! Well, fuck the Market, and now, with the latest reality therapy the imbecilic president/emperor has unintentionally inflicted on the economic lives of the People, maybe a few more of us will spit on the sycophants who demand we kneel and worship the Market and its "invisible hand"!!
- Uke Man
Free-market government? Bah!
Monday, March 31, 2008
By Robyn Blumner
If you had any doubts that our nation's financial overseers are working for those with wealth, the evidence was on full display when the Federal Reserve rode to the rescue of Wall Street. While families facing foreclosure are told by Washington (and Sen. John McCain) to try to renegotiate terms with their mortgage holder -- if they can figure out who that is -- those in the private-investment world who raked in wild riches by taking irresponsible risks are being bailed out of their liquidity crisis by the taxpayers.
All those billions of dollars in subprime-mortgage-backed securities that the investment houses can't borrow against because they are considered toxic are now being accepted by the Fed, an independent government agency, as collateral for upward of hundreds of billions of dollars in emergency loans.
I understand that economic disaster may have ensued had Bear Stearns simply been allowed to go bankrupt and had the machers in the investment world been left trying to pawn their collateralized securities for what they could get. But what a sweet gig it is to be a member of the master-of-the-universe class. First, you are awash in money created by risk-laden investments that disregard all warning signs; meanwhile, the rest of working America lives with stagnating wages even as the economy expands. When all those investments collapse, you are considered too big to fail and the government swoops in to keep you afloat.
Socialized risk is what this is called. Heads, they win; tails, we lose.
If this credit crunch and the pain to come teaches us anything, it is that when the market is allowed to operate without supervision and regulation, insuperable greed will overcome rational, prudent behavior. Josef Ackermann, chief executive of Deutsche Bank, said it straight out in a speech this month, "I no longer believe in the market's self-healing power."
He's in good company. Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and numerous other Wall Street titans don't believe in it either, turning instead to the central bank for a handout to cover their bad bets. They should know that by bellying up to the discount window, where they can borrow money previously available only to the regulated commercial banking industry, the "leave us alone" days of the private investment banks are over. No justification for regulators keeping hands off exists any longer.
What I can't get out of my head is the way we've been suckered again into believing the malarkey sold by Milton Friedman, Ronald Reagan, Alan Greenspan and a long list of conservative think tanks, that the market is our savior. It is so convenient to make government the bad guy, the one who interferes with everyone's pot of gold, and make open markets the answer to what ails, as Reagan did so often. But the historical reality is that the free market has a dark side that causes social displacement and instability, and by its nature it is an uncaring thing.
The free market does not raise an eyebrow when investor obsession with short-term profits results in outsourcing for cheap, exploitable labor overseas and the abandonment of health benefits or pensions for whatever American employees remain. Rather, it cheers.
The market is not the best part of America. Not even close. Our government is the best part -- or at least it used to be, before the current gang took over.
Ultimately, it is government that defines who we are and lays out a path for how our society will be. The market wouldn't have built a uniform system of roads and bridges or provided free public education. It wouldn't have guaranteed minimum wages or insisted on safe workplaces. Economists who claim that the market would have filled these gaps are not students of history. And without the government's backstop of depositor money, we would still have bank runs.
But somewhere along the way, we started to buy Reagan's line that the 10 most dangerous words are, Hi, I'm from the government, and I'm here to help. Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers didn't think those words were so scary.
Reagan and his ideological partners steered us wrong. They convinced the middle class to mistrust the only friend it has that is bigger than the free-market bully.
Only government can reset the scales and make this country a fair place again, where you don't have to be a master-of-the-universe-class member to know that you can afford college for your kids and a decent retirement for yourself. When the government stopped helping the middle class, the prosperity of this land stopped getting shared.
So after the government's done rescuing Wall Street, the rest of us could use some kind attention, too. But we'd need a different government for that -- a very different government.
Robyn Blumner writes for Tribune Media Services.
blumner@sptimes.com








