Friday, April 28, 2006

Auruprint (a movie with the Uke Man in it and his music behind the titles, too)

Hey Folks,

Here's something to keep you smiling in between my missives from NYC. It's a movie a friend of nine made (that I'm in - playing a gay porn movie director).

It's a bit of a download, but well worth it. If the link below doesn't work, go to http://www.alienstevens.com .
On second thought, be sure to check out Alien Stevens' whacky web-site as well.

- Uke Man




http://www.alienstevens.com/vid_aud_pix/artflixx_m/auraprint.mov

In New York City

Hey Folks,

I'm here. Good flight in. Ron had everything ready for my arrival - took the shuttle from Nerk (as we call it in Ahia), and got dropped off at the front door of a beautiful and nostalgic Brownswtone. After lugging three bags up four flights (I AM getting old!!), I was ready to get ready.

That evening I got to the theater - quite a deal! 3 or 4 stages going at once! I got to play my set: Paintin' Them Toes, A Day in the Life, Pirate, and Jesus Chrysler. As always, NYC and the crowd inspired the Uke Man. It was great and GREAT FUN !!!!

Jason and Ted of Sonic Uke are so good and caring. They're running the "Cabaret" and they MAKE it fun!!!

Besides Jason and Ted, I've gotten to see some other old uke-friends (there might be another California trip in store).

I tried calling in an audio blog, but it didn't work. Sorry for the blog being slow - I have limited access and time. I'll make up for it when I get back.

I'll ad more at some point. All the best.

- Uke Man

Wednesday, April 26, 2006


"Hey Bush !! Go Cheney yourself !!" Posted by Picasa

Mr. Malaprop - Bush video

Hey Folks,

Never misunderestimate Presidentiary verbalation deliverated by a Yale aluminum ... er ... alumineye ... er ... a Yaler - uh, a guy from Yale - whatever. You get the picture!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7fo98SzCGo&search=bush

I'm off in the morning to NEW YORK CITY !!! I'll try to report in via phone and occasional access to my pal Ron's computer. Gonna sing, play, and march against the war and the actual "Evil Empire": the Bush Regime!! Look for me on the film at 11:00 !!!

- Uke Man

"We are All Together" Posted by Picasa

"I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together"

When we start labeling people
Charles M. Madigan - the Chicago Tribune, April 25, 2006

I have names for you to think about.

Anthony Folia, Frank Boras, Peter Resor, Paul Hurtack Sr., Antonio Pino.

I found them in the archives of Pennsylvania's Department of Mines andMinerals Industries. They are among thousands of names I have collected inmy pursuit of important questions: Who was my father? Who was mygrandfather? Who was my great-grandfather?

Of course I knew two of the three. But I could not know them as young men,between 1898 and 1949, when they were all coal miners.

In this search, I learned something about people who come here to work. Itis as important today as it was over the past century, when these men workedwith my family in the bituminous coal mines in Cambria County, Pa.

The nation is in a political debate about immigration. One little chapter ofthe struggle focuses on what we should call the people who come here, withpapers or not, for work. Aliens, immigrants, migrants, illegals. We castaround, searching for something politically acceptable, something correct.

When we finally settle on this question, we will have committed one of ourmost common cultural offenses, the labeling of people as members of a class.No names. No stories. No personalities. Just members of whatever group titlewe settle upon.

In the category of wrongs, it might not seem like a great offense until youthink about what labeling does. It creates an inhuman description of veryhuman people.

It diminishes them.

I know quite well how we referred to the people whose names I have listed.They were whatever convenient, diminishing label we could paste on them,anything but what they deserved, their names. Eastern Europeans somehowbecame "hunkies." Italians, Germans, Irish, they all collected titles thatwere equally diminishing.

What I can tell you about all of these men is that they are officiallydescribed in the archives as "alien," a broad category that lumped togethereveryone who was not a U.S. citizen. Nationality is listed, too, and thenthe small stories of how it ended for them.

I am presenting them in tribute, because before we are members of any group,we are individuals. They gave us fuel to make steel, energy for light andheat in our homes, coal for our steam engines, all for very little money andat great risk.

Frank Boras, 43, died at Sonman Drift Mine on Jan. 22, 1902. He wasHungarian and left a widow and seven children.

He was crushed when coal fell from the roof of the mine.

Peter Resor, 31, was Polish. He was killed Nov. 13, 1903, in a roof collapseat Eureka Mine No. 37. He was survived by his widow and four children.

Anthony Folia, 61, Italian, died at Brush Valley Mine in Cambria County,Pa., on April 23, 1909, in a fall of slate from the roof of the mine. Heleft his widow and five children.

Paul Hurtack Sr., 42, Czecho-Slovakian and a veteran of 28 years in themines, was killed March 23, 1935, at Springfield No. 1 Mine, when the coalhe was undercutting at the face of the mine collapsed. He was survived byhis wife and five children.

Antonio Pino, 50, was Italian and he died at Westland Coal Co.'s No. 7 minein November 1945 (the date is lost) in an accident while setting a jackpipe.He was survived by his wife and two children.

When you pay attention to the record, what you notice is that as timepasses, the last names of those killed or injured in the mines don't changemuch. They are still Eastern Europeans, Italians, Irish, Germans, almost allof them described as "miner," which, in the early years, demanded noeducation, no language skills, just a fearlessness you cannot imagine inthis era and a willingness to go deep into the earth for backbreaking work.

What changed was the description of their status. The closer you get to theend of these sad mining accident and death records, the more the mininginspectors pencil in "citizen" in the nationality block. All these lostnames became small, individual parts in the only broad description I feel iseternally acceptable.

Americans.

It is something to remember today when you look at the cabdrivers, therestaurant workers, the hotel workers, the people cutting the neighbor'slawn, every one of them. They are not aliens, illegals, migrants, whateverlabel we glue to them.

They are individuals first, with names, lives, families, joys and despairs.We owe them that, at the very least, so their stories are not lost.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006


"This country is, and should be, run by those of us who own it !!!! "! Posted by Picasa

"One Man / One Vote" ???

Hey Folks,

See the headline of the story below?

“Political ads could top $1 billion”

Makes you wonder. WHY would people spend SO much money to get elected to jobs which will pay the “public servant” about as much as a hustling suburban real-estate agent earns?

Pretty obvious, don’t you think?

It must reflect a BURNING DESIRE to serve the people and make a better world.

Right !!!

As we have all seen of late, a “public servant” can make a Whole Lot of money -on the side – once they are elected. They just have to be careful not to get caught.

But while these yo-yos DO benefit, they are not the ones who provide the billions for the campaigns. No, that comes from their masters, the top 1 to 10 percent on the wealth ladder. Those who can afford to OWN the politicians – Democrats as well as Republicans.

It’s “The Golden Rule” : He who has the gold makes the rules.

It mocks our imagined American “democracy” when “our” elected officials see their job as fulfilling the fantasies of the super rich while successfully pretending to fulfill ours.

“One dollar / one vote” isn’t our definition of democracy – it’s Bush’s; you know him; he's the guy who called his constituency “the Have’s and the Have More’s.”

- Uke Man


Political ads could top $1 billion: survey
By Paul J. Gough Fri Apr 21,

NEW YORK (Hollywood Reporter) - With midterm elections for the House and Senate looming in an uncertain political landscape, a new forecast finds that political ad spending in 2006 might beat the record set in 2004.

Political ad spending could top $1 billion, according to a Campaign Media Analysis Group forecast released Thursday at the Television Bureau of Advertising's annual marketing conference in New York.

The record for political spending came in 2004, when the hotly fought presidential campaign between President Bush and Democratic nominee Sen. John Kerry and other races saw $1.7President Bush' name=c1>SEARCHNews News Photos Images Web' name=c3>
billion spent on TV ads. Much of that went to local stations in the campaign battleground states such as Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Campaign Media Analysis Group chief operating officer Evan Tracey estimated Thursday the large number of competitive races -- half of the nation's governors, 40% of Senate seats and as many as 60 House seats -- and an increased limit on spending make it likely that there will be more than $1 billion in election ad spending this year.

David Rovics Posted by Picasa

a David Rovics Video

Hey Folks,

Last Tuesday night, as I reported earlier, I had the pleasure of experiencing the sharp and insightful, humanity-oriented music of singer/song-writers David Rovics, Alistair Hulett, and Dan Dougan.

Here is a video of one of David's songs, "New Orleans."

- Uke Man

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blc4wzAw1TI

(a ukethanks to Pam)

Monday, April 24, 2006


Photo by Ron Hester Posted by Picasa

Photos by Ron Hester Posted by Picasa

Joshua Tree & LA - by Ron Hester Posted by Picasa

Photos by Ron Hester Posted by Picasa

Photos by Ron Hester Posted by Picasa

Ron himself Posted by Picasa

Off to NYC for Music & Mayhem !!!

Hey Folks,

In a few days I’ll be taking off to New York City where I’ll be staying with my good friend and fellow artist Ron Hester in a beautiful Brooklyn Brownstone. Check out Ron's "My Space" site: http://www.myspace.com/ronhester . The pictures above are from Ron's recent trip west.

I’ll be playing three nights – Thursday through Saturday, April 27 through 29, as part of the NYUke Fest (http://www.nyukefest.com/ ) at The Theater for the New City in Manhattan.

The theater has multiple stages, all of which will be in action every night. I’m involved with the Ukulele Cabaret organized by my friends Jason Tagg and Ted Gottfried of Sonic Uke. You can see performances from past Ukulele Cabarets at: http://www.ukulelecabaret.com/ (just click on any picture - there are four of the Uke Man).

The blog may slow down a bit while I’m gone, but I’ll try to post enough written reports and called-in reports to keep it interesting. There will be pictures galore when I return.

They will include pictures from the April 29 Peace March (http://www.april29.org/ ) as well. “Ukuleles for Sanity” plans to be there marching, protesting, and working to make a better world.

- Uke Man

Sunday, April 23, 2006


Leonardo Posted by Picasa

Judas, DaVinci, and Duh !!

Hey Folks,

The news story below touches on the rhubarb over the "DaVinci Code" and the "Gospel of Judas." Many leaders of "the Faithful" have spoken out against both, seeing them as challenges to "the foundations of traditional belief by giving an alternative version of the [official] story."

This seems like a big deal, especially so to those "faithful" who believe the Bible is the literal word of God. They see it (the Bible they presently thump) as official, complete, perfect; adding to or contradicting it is impossible because God gave us his words a long time ago; He's not - it is supposed - going to be adding or adjusting now.

Well, there's an historical and factual problem for these folks: different religions don't agree on what "books" actually belong in the present Bible. Historically there have been big fights over what was to be considered actual parts of the real Bible.

These fights were carried on by people, human beings; and people decided - long after Jesus left - which books were (as far as they were concerned) the literal word of God and which weren't. People are deciding today, too, about the"DaVinci Code" and the "Gospel of Judas."

Seems pretty "iffy" to me. It's not like Moses brought the whole thing down from a mountain written out in granite by God's finger and in His handwriting. "He says/she says, they say/we say, I'm right/you're wrong, neh,neh,nehhhh, neh, nehhhh, neh" - sounds like a pretty lame way to establish what constitutes "the literal word of God."

It was lame when it was done originally, and it's lame now. It's like men arguing over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin; if there are angels and they dance and they would condescend to do so on a pin head, what human being would you trust to count them and report back honestly?

- Uke Man


LONDON (AFP) - The head of the worldwide Anglican Church, the Archbishop of Canterbury, is to denounce as "conspiracies" the plot of 'The Da Vinci Code' and the apparent emergence of the 'Gospel of Judas' ancient text.

Doctor Rowan Williams, the Church of England's most senior cleric, was set to use his Easter Sunday sermon at Canterbury Cathedral, in south eastern England, to highlight how religion is approached by the media, according to extracts of the speech obtained by AFP.

"One of the ways in which we now celebrate the great Christian festivals in our society is by a little flurry of newspaper articles and television programmes raking over the coals of controversies about the historical basis of faith," he will say.

"So it was no huge surprise to see a fair bit of coverage given a couple of weeks ago to the discovery of a 'Gospel of Judas', which was (naturally) going to shake the foundations of traditional belief by giving an alternative version of the story of the passion and resurrection."

The 'Gospel of Judas' -- an ancient Coptic manuscript from the third or fourth century -- maintains, as the Bible does not, that Jesus requested that Judas "betray" him by handing him to authorities for execution.

The document was reportedly discovered in Egypt in the 1970s and went on display in Cairo last Wednesday.

"You'll recognise the style, of course, from the saturation coverage of the 'Da Vinci Code' literature," Williams will say.

"Uuuhhhhhhhh ... What did they tell me to say here?" Posted by Picasa

Bush Impersonator - Mad TV Guy

Hey Folks,

This guy has Bush DOWN !!! (Clinton too)

click here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egdmdUj4oZk&search=bush

- Uke Man

Saturday, April 22, 2006


Maoist Soldier Posted by Picasa

National Geographic Video Report on the Revolution in Nepal

Hey Folks,

This National Geographic Video commentary is a generally good report, except for the “Who are the Good Guys” section, where the narrator can’t bring himself to pick a villain, but where the worst thing he can say about the Maoists is that a civilian was killed in the crossfire BETWEEN the TWO forces and that an unstated percentage of civilians had died in the conflict BETWEEN the TWO forces.

Moreover, this report was created in November of 2005 BEFORE the “civilians” joined with the Maoists in declaring the monarchy and its military-based government to be “the Bad Guy” and the oppressor of the people.”

Especially notice what the women of Nepal think about all this!

- Uke Man

Click here:
http://www7.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0511/feature3/multimedia.html

Nepal  Posted by Picasa

Trouble in Shangri-La

Hey Folks,

Below is an analysis by a friend of mine of the present situation in Nepal. Having read it and viewed/ listened to other reports, it struck me that the situation exposes a few things many of us may never have noticed before.

For some time now, we haven’t heard much about the situation in Nepal, and what we have been hearing has presented a negative perspective of the Maoist insurgents (of course, we have a long history of disdain for the C-word) . Numerous times I’ve seen it reported that 13,000 had been killed during the insurgency, but not until today did I see it clearly reported that 13,000 INSURGENTS had died fighting for their revolution.

For the most part, I believe, Americans either are totally unaware of this situation, or they have some vague notion that “communist terrorists” are opposing a benign monarchy and killing good people in Nepal.

This, however, is not the case. Even though our government has provided military and political support for this monarchy and have designated the king’s enemies as “terrorists,” the people of Nepal - Maoists and otherwise - are strongly resisting the monarchy. The people's resistance makes it clear: the Maoists are not "terrorists" but are and have been freedom-fighters. It is the Bush regime that has been lying - and the press has been largely negligent, complicit, or a patsy.

Any honest, clear-eyed view of the reality in Nepal quickly reveals who is for the people's “Freedom” and “Democracy” and who is concentrating on privilege, power, and profit at the EXPENSE of the people.

See the National Geographic Video commentary directly above this posting. A generally good report, except for the “Who are the Good Guys” section, where the narrator can’t decide who the villain is, but where the worst thing he can say about the Maoists is that a civilian was killed in the crossfire between both forces and that an unstated percentage of civilians had died in the fighting between both forces.

And this report was created in November of 2005 BEFORE the “civilians” joined with the Maoists in declaring the monarchy and its military-based government to be “the Bad Guy” and the oppressor of the people - disregarding the Bush administration's claims to the contrary.

- Uke Man





Revolution at the Roof of the World

The U.S. media has been forced by recent dramatic events in Nepal to provide a modicum of coverage of the quickening political situation there.

Seven parliamentary parties, in alliance with the Maoist insurgency whichcontrols a large majority of the countryside, are poised to wrest power fromthe hereditary monarch, King (Shah) Gyanedra, who a year ago abolishedParliament and instituted military rule.

The Royal Nepali Army, among the worst violators of human rights in theworld today, has been freshly equipped with increasingly lethal arms fromtheir friends in the Bush administration, which has designated theanti-Maoist campaign part of the “War on Terror”.

Despite their efforts, the insurgency has grown in scope and now effectivelycontrols as much as 80% of the countryside. In their secure base areas, thenew People*s Government is building the nucleus of a future democratic Nepal where discrimination against women and minorities is being combated and the needs of the poorest people of the poorest country in the world are being advanced.

It looks like the capital, Kathmandu, a city of 11/2 million, where, despitea shoot-to-kill curfew, a general strike and protests of people from allwalks of life has paralyzed the city, may sooner, rather than later, beunder new management.

Hundreds of thousands are expected to protest today (Thursday) in the faceof the army and martial law. One can only hope that the army rank-and-file,who are ordinary Nepalis after all, will refuse to take part in a bloodysuppression of their fellow citizens and perhaps even join them.

In addition, Indian government envoys, including a relative of the King,have arrived, and it’s not too farfetched to wonder if their discussions mayinclude an offer to evacuate Gyanedra to exile in India.

Here are some sources:

BBC online for the most up-to-date general
news:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4924610.stm

Hindustan Times (India) article with historical info:
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1678888,00120001.htm

Amnesty International Statement:
http://www.amnesty.org.uk/news/press/16959.shtml

Sunday times (London) article:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,25689-2141744,00.html

Asia Times article on the international context:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/HD19Df03.html

Great first-hand articles including by Li Onestro, who traveled in the redareas of Nepal:

http://rwor.org/a/044/nepal-mass-upsurge.htmand:http://rwor.org/s/nepal.htm

The Nepali Maoists, in their own words- lengthy analytical articles:
http://cpnm.org/new/English/statements/2005/statements_1feb2005.htm#17m

Standing up against oppression Posted by Picasa

More on This Later

Nepalese Police Open Fire on Protesters
By BINAJ GURUBACHARYA, Associated Press

KATMANDU, Nepal - Nepali security forces opened fire and beat protesters marching toward the royal palace Saturday, as opposition leaders rejected the king's proposals for restoring democracy in the Himalayan country.

Four people were wounded by rubber bullets or live ammunition, and dozens were injured by police wielding bamboo batons. The clash occurred about 3 miles from the royal palace in the heart of the capital, where tens of thousands of protesters were headed in defiance of a curfew.

"Security forces opened fire on the crowd without warning, wounding many of us," said Ganesh Shrestha, who was hit on the arm by a bullet.

At the nearby Norvic Hospital, the hallways were jammed with injured people calling for care. Doctors there confirmed at least four people were injured by rubber bullets or live ammunition, and 43 were hurt by batons or in the scramble to flee.

The violence erupted after an alliance of seven opposition parties rejected King Gyanendra's offer to allow them to nominate a prime minister and form a government.

"We will not accept," Madhav Kumar Nepal, general secretary of Communist Party of Nepal, told cheering supporters in Katmandu. "We will continue the protests."

The crowd chanted, "We are here to support you. Don't get weak in the knees. Don't ditch the people."

Complete story at: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060422/ap_on_re_as/nepal

Hell to the Chief Posted by Picasa

Graffiti on Air Force 1

Hey Folks,

Check this out and then click at the bottom for the VIDEO !!

- Uke Man



Air Force One Subject of Internet Hoax

By TED BRIDIS, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - A startling Internet video that shows someone spraying graffiti on President Bush's jet looked so authentic that the Air Force wasn't immediately certain whether the plane had been targeted.


It was all a hoax. No one actually sprayed the slogan "Still Free" on the cowling of Air Force One.

The pranksters responsible for the grainy, two-minute Web video — employed by a New York fashion company — revealed Friday how they pulled it off: a rented 747 in California painted to look almost exactly like Air Force One.

"I wanted to do something culturally significant, wanted to create a real pop-culture moment," said Marc Ecko of Marc Ecko Enterprises. "It's this completely irreverent, over-the-top thing that could really never happen: this five-dollar can of paint putting a pimple on this Goliath."

The video shows hooded graffiti artists climbing barbed-wire fences and sneaking past guards with dogs to approach the jumbo jet. They spray-paint a slogan associated with free expression.

After the video began circulating on the Web on Tuesday, the Air Force checked to see whether the plane had been vandalized.

"We're looking at it, too," said Lt. Col. Bruce Alexander, a spokesman for the Air Mobility Command's 89th Airlift Wing, which operates Air Force One. "It looks very real."

Alexander later confirmed that no such spray-painting had occurred.

Ecko acknowledged Friday that his company had rented a 747 cargo jet at San Bernardino's airport and covertly painted one side to look like Air Force One. Employees signed secrecy agreements and worked inside a giant hangar until the night the video was made. Ecko declined to say how much the stunt cost.

"It's not cheap," he said. "You have to be rich."


http://www.stillfree.com/ then click on the airplane in the top, left corner.

Friday, April 21, 2006

 Posted by Picasa

Egg Man, Walrus, or Decider ??

Hey Folks,

Who gets the royalties? The Beatles or Michael Jackson?


Click here for the Karaoke:
http://decider.cf.huffingtonpost.com/

- Uke Man

Ah know what "MF" means.

What does the "I" stand for? Posted by Picasa

The “Greatest Nation in the World” seems a little Touchy, Don’t You Think?

US hits back over 'questionable' IMF comments
excerpts – entire story at: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060419/pl_afp/imfeconomygrowth_060419205833


WASHINGTON (AFP) - The US government issued a barbed riposte after the IMF suggested Washington institute health insurance for all Americans and balance its budget faster than planned.

Tim Adams, the Treasury undersecretary for international affairs, demanded that the International Monetary Fund get back to its "raison d'etre" of monitoring global currency rates rather than commenting on health care.

"We have been the product of IMF scrutiny for a long time. They don't mince any words or waste any time talking about the US," Adams told a news conference after the IMF released its semi-annual World Economic Outlook.

"In fact it appears ... that they were once again delving into issues that are questionable topics for the IMF to be looking at," he said.

Speaking at the launch of the Outlook report, IMF chief economist Raghuram Rajan said earlier Wednesday that the United States was not always the poster child for the policies long advocated by the Fund.

"In a globally competitive economy, it is very important you insure the individual, you have a safety net for the individual, because they're at serious risk of losing their job and so on," Rajan said.

"Which means you have to have some form of universal health care. It is very, very hard, in this competitive economy, for 40-million-plus Americans to be uninsured, of which eight million are children," he said.

"So you need universal health care, you need strong educational systems, so the challenge of improving education in the United States, especially in poorer areas, is extremely important."


Adams retorted: "I don't really think that's the purview of the IMF. This is an institution that really needs to get focused, and needs to get focused on its mission and its core expertise."

* * *

Yeah !! Folks, can you believe it?

What the hell is this crap about Health Care and Education? Our government invented the IMF to screw – not help - FOREIGN workers. We can fuck our own American workers just fine, thank you, without any help from the stupid IMF !!

- Uke Man

"Shucks." Posted by Picasa

"Such a Card / Quite a Guy!! - Bush video

Dubya relives Junior High !!

Click here, Beavis:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w92yLxz3ovc&search=bush

- Uke Man

I guess he DIDN'T use this finger." Posted by Picasa

Thursday, April 20, 2006


"who's the 'asshole' now !!" Posted by Picasa

**She Probably Did Something to Piss-off Kkkarl Rove**

Hey Folks,

I bet she was surprised – not used to revealing her true feelings !!

- Uke Man



Lawmaker Puzzled by Obscenity in Letter

By SAM HANANEL, Associated Press Writer Wed Apr 19

WASHINGTON - Nobody expects to get a letter from a member of Congress that ends with an expletive.

But that's what happened when Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo., recently corresponded with a resident of her southeast Missouri district.

The letter ended with a profane, seven-letter insult beginning with the letter a — "i think you're an ... [asshole]"

Emerson says she can't explain how the offensive language made it into the letter, which otherwise reads like a typical response to a citizen's question about last year's testimony of oil executives before the Senate Commerce Committee . . .
"No, the President used this finger." Posted by Picasa

Gay-Fundamentalist-Democrat Conspiracy Revealed

Golly Folks,

Have I ever been dumb !!

When I read the story today about Scott McClellan resigning “to spend more time with his family,” the truth crystallized in my head like a blood clot! The McClellan quarter slipped into my slot machine mind and the spinning wheels clicked into place – one – two – three - all Blazing 7's !! There it was; how could I have missed it?

While the Religious Right has been grinding away on “Family Values” and the "evils of homosexuality" - screeching like insane, moronic, vengeful vampires – all this time it’s just been a con, a put-up job, a charade. And, boy, has it succeeded!!

They suckered those poor, sappy Republicans! They really punked ‘em!

The crowning glory was pretending to be anti-gay / pro-Republican via all that multi-state hoopla over gay marriage, convincing the R’s that the key to their success was gay-bashing, and backing up their claim by having their savvy congregations pretend, so well, to be stiff-necked ignoramuses who couldn’t tell Jesus from Father Coughlin. Brilliant !! And it continues with the attacks on gay adoption (the icing on the cake).

Those poor, dumb Republicans don't have a clue. Soon, with so many of them getting out of politics “to spend more time with their families” (notice the “Family Values” there!) voters will feel foolish electing anyone with a family; that kind of person won’t stick with it; they'll leave you flat when you need them most!!! Of course they will - they’ve been Family-values brainwashed by such sly, religious, gay-loving folks as Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Franklin Graham, Ken Blackwell, and Rod Parsley – bless ‘em.

Yep. We are all well-advised to avoid family-type, sunshine patriot Republicans; but who’s left?

Well, single folks; better yet, single folks who can’t – under pain of law – get married or even adopt children !! folks who can never have a family of their own. Yep, the only sensible thing is to elect nothing but gays!!

And it gets worse for Republicans. Since only Democrats have ever shown the slightest respect toward gays, any unmarried Republican who tried to run as a gay would be laughed out of town.

Brilliant!!!

Before long gay Democrats will be running everything, the war will be over and the government can finally get around to caring about the real issues of regular folks (as well as raising the taxes on millionaires and bringing the oil companies to heel). Better yet, those long-suffering, dedicated thespians - Falwell, Robertson, Graham, Blackwell, and Parsley - can quit pretending and show true love for their fellow men, just as Jesus so eloquently taught.

Say, "Amen!"

- Uke Man

Wednesday, April 19, 2006


that damned bush is goin' down Posted by Picasa

Bush-Bashing Video

Click here, Dude, to see Bush bashed!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VexhmohBQA&search=bush


- Uke Man

A Great Time !!! Posted by Picasa

the David Rovics - Alistair Hulett Concert

Hey Folks,

Last night I had the pleasure of experiencing the sharp and insightful, humanity-oriented music of singer/song-writers David Rovics, Alistair Hulett, and Dan Dougan.

It was a wonderful, uplifting experience, and I plan on seeing Alistair again, when I invade the U.K. on my "World Tour."

You can hear both David and Alistair at http://www.davidrovics.com/ and http://www.folkicons.co.uk/alistair.htm respectively (and respectfully).

And, of course, stop by Little Brothers to tip your hat to Danny Dougan!

Thanks to everyone who helped in the realization of this concert.

- Uke Man

David Rovics Posted by Picasa

David Rovics Posted by Picasa

Alistair Hulett Posted by Picasa

Alistair Hulett Posted by Picasa

Connie "the Organizer" Harris Posted by Picasa

Dan "The Man" Dougan Posted by Picasa

Enjoying the show:Tracy
and Daclan "Buster" Dougan
Posted by Picasa

Alistair, David, Pam Raver, Uke Man Posted by Picasa

Tuesday, April 18, 2006


Mark Twain Posted by Picasa

Twain - Food for Thought #1

Hey Folks,

As promised here is some comentary inspired by Mark Twain's A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. ( The whole Uke Man short version of the story is at: http://www.ukuleleman.net/2006/03/complete-twain-postings.html )

from Chapter 8 – :

"Well, it was a curious country, and full of interest. And the people! They were the quaintest and simplest and trustingest race; why they were nothing but rabbits. It was pitiful for a person born in a wholesome free atmosphere to listen to their humble and hearty outpourings of loyalty toward their king and Church and nobility: as if they had any more occasion to love and honor king and Church and noble than a slave has to love and honor the lash, or a dog has to love and honor the stranger that kicks him! Why, dear me, ANY kind of royalty, howsoever modified, ANY kind of aristocracy, however pruned, is rightly an insult; but if you are born and brought up under that sort of arrangement you probably never find it out for yourself, and don’t believe it when somebody else tells you."

1. Do we live in a "curious country"?

2. Are too many of us quaint and simple and trusting? like rabbits ?

3. Do we humbly and heartily express our loyalty to those "above" us on the socio-economic-political ladder?

4. Do they deserve our humble loyalty?

5. Do we live under an economic aristocracy ? and is that an insult?

6. Will we ever find it out for ourselves?

7. Would you believe me if I told you?

- Uke Man

"What's good for the rich, William,is good for America."

"Okay Cal, but let's play golf." Posted by Picasa

Krugman on Tax Breaks for the Rich

Hey Folks,

More info on the screwing of America. See Froma Harrop's column below>

- Uke Man


Weapons of Math Destruction
By PAUL KRUGMAN
(a ukethanks to Phyll)

Now it can be told: President Bush and Vice President Dick
Cheney based their re-election campaign on lies, damned lies and statistics.

The lies included Mr. Cheney's assertion, more than three months after intelligence analysts determined that the famous Iraqi trailers weren't bioweapons labs, that we were in possession of two "mobile biological facilities that can be used to produce anthrax or smallpox."

The damned lies included Mr. Bush's declaration, in his "Mission Accomplished" speech, that "we have removed an ally of Al Qaeda."

The statistics included Mr. Bush's claim, during his debates with
John Kerry, that "most of the tax cuts went to low- and middle-income Americans."

Compared with the deceptions that led us to war, deceptions about taxes can seem like a minor issue. But it's all of a piece. In fact, my early sense that we were being misled into war came mainly from the resemblance between the administration's sales pitch for the Iraq war — with its evasions, innuendo and constantly changing rationale — and the selling of the Bush tax cuts.

Moreover, the hysterical attacks the administration and its defenders launch against anyone who tries to do the math on tax cuts suggest that this is a very sensitive topic. For example, Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa once compared people who say that 40 percent of the Bush tax cuts will go to the richest 1 percent of the population to, yes, Adolf Hitler.

And just as administration officials continued to insist that the
trailers were weapons labs long after their own intelligence analysts had concluded otherwise, officials continue to claim that most of the tax cuts went to the middle class even though their own tax analysts know better.

How do I know what the administration's tax analysts know? The facts are there, if you know how to look for them, hidden in one of the administration's propaganda releases.

The Treasury Department has put out an exercise in spin called
the "Tax Relief Kit," which tries to create the impression that most of the tax cuts went to low- and middle-income families. Conspicuously missing from the document are any actual numbers about how the tax cuts were distributed among different income classes. Yet Treasury analysts have calculated those numbers, and there's enoughinformation in the "kit" to figure out what they discovered.

An explanation of how to extract the administration's estimates of the distribution of tax cuts from the "Tax Relief Kit" is here. Here's the bottomline: about 32 percent of the tax cuts went to the richest 1 percent of Americans, people whose income this year will be at least $341,773. About 53 percent of the tax cuts went to the top 10 percent of the population. Remember, these are the administration's own numbers — numbers that it refuses to release to the public.

I'm sure that this column will provoke a furious counterattack from the administration, an all-out attempt to discredit my math. Yet if I'm wrong, there's an easy way to prove it: just release the raw data used to construct the table titled "Projected Share of Individual Income Taxes and Income in 2006."Memo to reporters: if the administration doesn't release those numbers, that's in effect a confession of guilt, an implicit admission that the data contradict the administration's spin.

And what about the people Senator Grassley compared to Hitler, those who say that the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans will receive 40 percent of the tax cuts? Although the "Tax Relief Kit" asserts that "nearly all of the tax cut provisions" are already in effect, that's not true: one crucial piece of the Bush tax cuts, elimination of the estate tax, hasn't taken effect yet. Since only estates bigger than $2 million, or $4 million for a married couple, face taxation, the great bulk of the gains from estate tax repeal will go to the wealthiest 1 percent. This will raise their share of the overall tax cuts to, you guessed it, about 40 percent.

Again, the point isn't merely that the Bush administration has squandered the budget surplus it inherited on tax cuts for the wealthy. It's the fact that the administration has spent its entire term in office lying about the nature of those tax cuts. And all the world now knows what I suspected from the start: an administration that lies about taxes will also lie about other, graver matters.

Monday, April 17, 2006

"What'd he say?"

 Posted by Picasa

Bush - "Invigorating youth" - Video

To share in the excitement, click here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw9JwyNLItI&search=bush
 Posted by Picasa

We Get Exactly What the System is Designed to Provide

"To the tycoons reveling in their personal splendor, America was about taking, not giving, and the job of the masses was to toil for them cheaply."
- - - - Froma Harrop on the "Gilded Age" then and now.




U.S. Firms Recruit Cheap Labor in Mexico

By JULIE WATSON and OLGA R. RODRIGUEZ, Associated Press Writers Sat Apr 15, 2:24 PM ET

SASABE, Mexico - When Pedro Lopez Vazquez crossed illegally into the United States last week, he was not heading north to look for a job. He already had one.

His future employer even paid $1,000 for a smuggler to help Vazquez make his way from the central Mexican city of Puebla to Aspen, Colo.

"We're going to Colorado to work in carpentry because we have a friend who was going to give us a job," Vazquez said.

Vazquez, 41, was interviewed along the Arizona border after being deported twice by the U.S. Border Patrol. He said he would keep trying until he got to Aspen.

His story is not unusual. A growing number of U.S. employers and migrants are tapping into an underground employment network that matches one with the other, often before the migrants leave home.

"It continues to become clear who controls immigration: It's not governments, but rather the market," said Jorge Santibanez, director of the Tijuana-based think-tank Colegio de la Frontera Norte.

As debate over immigration heats up in the United States, more and more U.S. companies in need of cheap labor are turning to undocumented employees to recruit friends and relatives back home, and to smugglers to find job seekers.

Darcy Tromanhauser, of the nonprofit law project Nebraska Appleseed, said companies in need of workers rely on the networks to "pass along the information more effectively than billboards."

"It started out more explicitly, where (meatpacking) companies used to have buses to transport people to come up, and they would advertise directly in Mexico," she said. "Now I think that happens more informally."

At the same time, it has become less risky for companies to recruit illegal migrants. Since the Sept. 11 terror attacks, U.S. prosecution of employers who hire such workers has dwindled to a trickle as the government puts its resources toward national security.

The few cases that are prosecuted, however, highlight how lucrative a business recruiting undocumented workers has become. In one case, a single smuggler allegedly earned $900,000 over 15 months placing 6,000 migrants in jobs at Chinese restaurants across the upper Midwest.

Shan Wei Yu, a 51-year-old Chinese-American, was sentenced in December to nine years in federal prison on charges involving the transportation of 40 of those migrants. Investigations involving the others continue.

Rick Hilzendager, special agent for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Grand Forks, N.D., said Yu connected 6,000 migrants from Latin America with jobs in Chinese restaurants in Illinois, Michigan, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin.

Based in Yu's home in McKinney, Texas, the Great Texas Employment Agency placed ads in Chinese-language newspapers in the Chicago area offering cheap labor from Latin America, investigators said.

Yu sent a recruiter with Spanish interpreters to find migrants in Dallas willing to be fry cooks and dishwashers, Hilzendager said. A team made up mostly of illegal Chinese immigrants rented cars and drove them up.

Yu allegedly charged a $150 finder's fee for each migrant while the drivers earned $300 per worker. Restaurant owners deducted the $450 from workers' first-month paychecks of $1,000.

"It was just so easy," Hilzendager said.

Nick Chase, assistant U.S. attorney in North Dakota, said Yu even offered to replace workers free of charge if one left within two weeks of starting.

"It was a 2-for-1 special — like a pizza," Chase said. "Everything about it was ugly."

The employees, housed in cramped apartments provided by employers, worked 14-hour days and had little outside contact. The case broke open in August 2004 after two Mexican migrants working at the Buffet House in Grand Forks fled poor conditions and were picked up along a highway by Border Patrol agents.

Many of the drivers involved in the scheme were deported to China. Two North Dakota restaurant owners were sentenced to four months each for harboring illegal immigrants.

But many migrants, and many employers, say the recruiters provide a valuable service. Sergio Sosa, who organizes Nebraska meatpackers, said many are seen as heroes in the Mexican towns where the workers come from.

Sosa, speaking by telephone from Omaha, said that in the 1990s companies bused migrants from the U.S.-Mexico border, paying them room and board plus salaries of $100 a week. But after a government crackdown, they began to rely more on their workers to recruit friends and family back in Mexico.

"One of the meatpacking supervisors is from Michoacan, and most of the people working for him come from his town," Sosa said. "There's no official recruiting — it's more internal through family."

Migrants setting out along the border confirmed his account. Guadalupe Mendez, 26, said her sister found her work as a seamstress in Los Angeles. Lorenzo Garcia Ruiz, 38, said friends arranged a gardening job for him in Kentucky.

To make a real dent in this network, the U.S. government would need to go after employers or make them pay the costs of legalizing workers, migration activists say.

But an August 2005 report of the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, indicates the opposite is happening. After the Sept. 11 attacks, work-site inspections by U.S. immigration officials plummeted as they focused on national security cases.

From 1999 to 2004, the number of businesses that faced fines dropped from 417 to three, the GAO said. Data after 2004 could not be compared because the government changed the way it records data.

Investigators say fake documents makes it difficult to prove an employer has knowingly hired an undocumented worker. The business community argues that employers aren't equipped to spot fraud and warns that more investigations could lead to workplace discrimination.

Chase said businesses must be kept in check.

"There are employers out there who are always going to be tempted by the bottom line," he said.

victims of discrimination and scapegoating Posted by Picasa

Poor Little Rich White Boys

Hey Folks,

Kathleen Parker, felt the need today in her column to defend that most downtrodden and defenseless minority: rich, white males. She decries the blatant discrimination and prejudice that's been levied especially against “spoiled white boys who think the world owes them a good time” and points out that over the decades this has gotten worse.

She has a point. First, they allowed white men without property to vote. Then they freed the slaves. Then, they let women vote. Then they let Blacks vote. Then Michael Moore’s book Stupid White Men. Now this outrage at Duke (Parker equates it to “the lynch-mob mentality that once channeled rage against blacks”). Where will it end?

Let's have a moment of prayful silence for the long-suffering spoiled white boys who think the world owes them a good time.

But be careful. Some left-wing moonbat is likely to protest: “What are you talking about? Discrimination ??? There’s a spoiled white boy who think the world owes him a good time living in the White House!!


- Uke Man

Sunday, April 16, 2006

"Do I LOOK like I want a damn carrot !!" Posted by Picasa

Happy Holiday

Hey Folks,

May all the eggs in your basket be colorful and lively !

Click here:
http://www.jacquielawson.com/viewcard.asp?code=QZ40293483

- Uke Man
(a ukethanks to Sondra)

The Breakers from the air Posted by Picasa

The Breakers Posted by Picasa

The Marble Palace Posted by Picasa

The Elms Posted by Picasa

Froma Harrop

Hey Folks,

Froma Harrop, who appears irregularly in the Dispatch is a favorite of mine, and in her most recent column she hit the nail on the head !!!

Below is the "Thank You" letter I sent her and the column itself.

I am particularly pleased that she pointed out a lie that has been foisted on the masses by the Super-rich, via their toadies in the Bush Administration: "The top 1 percent of incomes pay 34 percent of all federal individual income taxes."

Conveniently our honorable leaders always fail to include the massive payroll taxes regular folks pay (and which the super-rich essentially escape). Makes you wonder what "democracy" really means if government serves the top 1 % at the expense of the rest of us!

- Uke Man


Dear Ms. Harrop,

Your piece on taxes was the best, most important, and - to me - gratifying column I've read in quite a while.

Everything you reported has needed reporting for a long, long time. Sure, bits have been put out now and then and here and there; in small, back-pages news stories or in small circulation progressive publications; but not all together and on the editorial page and by a nationally syndicated columnist on April 15 !!

Thanks.

Now there is no excuse for the people not to stand up on their hind legs and demand a change.

If they don't, perhaps we should consider calling this the "Gelded Age."

Yours - Tom Harker, Ukulele Man






The Gilded Age
by Froma Harrop

Come to Newport, R.I., and see what America was like before the income tax. The Elms is a Gilded Age mansion graced by a Louis XV ballroom and tapestries from Imperial Russia. Its owner made his tax-free fortune off the coal mines of Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Down the street is Rosecliff, a copy of the Grand Trianon at Versailles and financed by Nevada's Comstock Lode. Steamships and railroads paid for the Vanderbilts' 70-room Breakers and equally lavish Marble House. Like the other Newport mansions, they were used for only a few weeks in the summer.

To the tycoons reveling in their personal splendor, America was about taking, not giving, and the job of the masses was to toil for them cheaply. But by the dawn of the 20th century, American farmers, miners and factory workers started thinking that the Vanderbilts and their ilk should contribute more to the country. And so on Oct. 3, 1913, President Woodrow Wilson signed the bill that created an income tax. It touched only the wealthiest 4 percent.

This piece of history needs remembering as the Bush administration passes around statistics purporting to show that today's wealthiest Americans bear an unreasonable tax burden. The helpers in the Republican base, meanwhile, sing songs of gratitude to the modern moguls. They refer to them as golden geese, who would perish if tax rates returned to the Clinton-era levels -- even though the rich did wonderfully well in the '90s.

The Bush people are particularly fond of noting that in 2003 the top 1 percent in incomes paid 34 percent of all federal individual income taxes. That's not terribly surprising when you consider that the richest 1 percent now earn 15 percent of all the money made in America, and that the income tax was designed to be progressive. (In 1913, the top 1 percent were raking in a not-very-different 18 percent of total U.S. income.)

Middle-income families also pay federal income taxes, and some tax-cut crumbs have fallen their way. But do compare the helpings. For 2006, the Bush tax cuts are worth $39,000 to people with incomes above $403,000 (the top 1 percent) and only about $750 to those making around $50,000, according to the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center. Put another way, the elite 1 percent enjoy a 5 percent increase in their after-tax income, while folks in the middle see a 2.5 percent gain.

Of course, the administration propaganda totally ignores payroll taxes, which bring in nearly the same amount of revenues as individual income taxes. When you add all the federal taxes, the top 1 percent account for only 23 percent of the total.

The interesting part will come when the federal government is forced to stop borrowing money and start paying its bills honestly. Who is going to finance government then? The Bush camp has been lining up the planets to ensure that any future tax increases fall onto the middle class.

The centerpiece is the lowered tax on investment income, which Republicans are trying to keep at 15 percent. As a result, the idle rich living off their stock portfolios are taxed at 15 percent, while the working husband and wife, each earning $40,000, pay a marginal tax rate of 25 percent. Even Ronald Reagan was content to have dividends and capital gains treated like "sweat" income.

In 1904, Mrs. Hermann Oehlrichs held her famous "Bal Blanc" at Rosecliff. Everything was white -- from the women's gowns to the truckloads of exotic flowers dumped in the gold ballroom. Mrs. Oehlrichs even asked the U.S. Navy to anchor its "White Fleet" just off her property, as a kind of decoration. When the Navy said no, she commissioned an army of carpenters to build a dozen full-size ship models, which were set in the Atlantic Ocean.

Nine years later, the American public felt justified in asking Mrs. Oehlrichs and other fabulously wealthy citizens to help the country that had so enriched them. Though today's federal income tax covers the middle class, it still asks more of the rich than of others. And that's the way it should be. President Bush clearly regards progressive taxation as a hurdle for the expanding fortunes of our new Gilded Age.

Rosecliff Exterior Posted by Picasa

Rosecliff Interior Posted by Picasa
 Posted by Picasa

I Love You, Mom

Saturday, April 15, 2006

What do you see #1 ? Posted by Picasa

The Riddle

(a ukethanks to Travis & Trini)


On his trip to Great Britain, George Bush had a meeting with Queen Elizabeth.

He asked her, "What is the secret to running a country smoothly?"

"That's easy," replied the Queen. "You surround yourself with intelligent ministers and advisors."

"But how can I tell whether they are intelligent or not?" inquired Bush.

"You ask them a riddle," she replied, and with that she pressed a button and said, "Would you please send Tony Blair in."

When Blair arrived, the Queen said, "I have a riddle for you to answer for me....Your parents had a child and it was not your sister and it was not your brother. Who was this child?"

Blair replied, "That's easy. The child was me."

"Very good," said the Queen, "You may go now."

So President Bush went back to Washington and called in his chief of staff, Karl Rove. He said to him, "I have a riddle for you, and the answer is very important. Your parents had a child and it was not your sister and it was not your brother. Who was this child?"

Rove replied, "Yes, it is clearly very important that we determine the answer, as no child must be left behind. Can I deliberate on this for a while?"

"Yes," said Bush, "I'll give you four hours to come up with the answer."

So Rove went and called a meeting of the White House
Staff and asked them the riddle. But after much discussion
and many suggestions, none of them had a satisfactory
answer.


So he was quite upset, not knowing what he would tell the President.


As Rove was walking back to the Oval Office, he saw
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell approaching him. So
he said, "Mr. Secretary, can you answer this riddle for me? Your parents had a child and it was not your sister and it was not your brother. Who was the child?"


"That's easy," said Powell, "The child was me."


"Oh thank you," said Rove, "You may just have saved
me my job!"


So Rove went in to the Oval Office and said to President Bush, "I think I know the answer to your riddle. The child was Colin Powell!"


"No, you idiot!" shouted Bush, "The child was Tony
Blair"


What do you see #2 Posted by Picasa
 Posted by Picasa

Songs of the Far Right Wing - video

Hey Folks !

These songs are Not Sold in ANY Store !!!!

http://folksongsofthefarrightwing.cf.huffingtonpost.com/

- Uke Man
 Posted by Picasa

Molly Speaks the Truth on Immigration

Hey Folks,

I've been reading Molly Ivins for years and years, and she talks straight! She is from Texas and is an expert on society and politics both there and throughout the nation.

She has lived her entire life observing first-hand what's involved with this so-called "illegal immigration problem."

She and the Ukulele Man see eye to eye !!

- Uke Man


Immigration 101 for Beginners ---------------- and Non-Texans

by Molly Ivins

In 1983, I was a judge at the Terlingua Chili Cookoff, and my memory of the events may not be perfect—for example, for years I’ve been claiming Jimmy Carter was president at the time, but that’s the kind of detail one often loses track of in Terlingua.

Anyway, it was ’83 or some year right around there when we held The Fence climbing contest. See, people talked about building The Fence back then, too. The Fence along the Mexican border. To keep Them out.

At the time, the proposal was quite specific—a 17-foot cyclone fence with bob wire at the top. So a test fence was built at Terlingua, and the First-Ever Terlingua Memorial Over, Under or Through Mexican Fence Climbing Contest took place. Prize: a case of Lone Star beer. Winning time: 30 seconds.

I tell this story to make the one single point about the border and immigration we know to be true: The Fence will not work. No fence will work. The Great darn Wall of China will not work. Do not build a fence. It will not work. They will come anyway. Over, under or through.

Some of you think a fence will work because Israel has one. Israel is a very small country. Anyone who says a fence can fix this problem is a demagogue and an ass.

Numero Two-o, should you actually want to stop Mexicans and OTMs (other than Mexicans) from coming to the United States, here is how to do it: Find an illegal worker at a large corporation. This is not difficult—brooms and mops are big tipoffs. Then put the CEO of that corporation in prison for two or more years for violating the law against hiring illegal workers.

Got it? You can also imprison the corporate official who actually hired the illegal and, just to make sure, put some Betty Sue Billups—housewife, preferably one with blond hair in a flip—in the joint for a two-year stretch for hiring a Mexican gardener. Thus Americans are reminded that the law says it is illegal to hire illegal workers and that anyone who hires one is responsible for verifying whether or not his or her papers are in order. If you get fooled and one slips by you, too bad, you go to jail anyway. When there are no jobs for illegal workers, they do not come. Got it?

Of course, this has been proposed before, because there is nothing new in the immigration debate. As the current issue of Texas Monthly reminds us, the old bracero program dating from World War II was actually amended in 1952 to pass the “Texas proviso,” shielding employers of illegal workers from criminal penalties. They got the exemption because Texas growers flat refused to pay the required bracero wage of 30 cents an hour. Instead of punishing Texas growers for breaking the law, Congress rewarded them.

In 1986, the Reagan administration took a shot at immigration reform and reinstated penalties on employers. They weren’t enforced worth a darn, of course. In 2004, only three American companies were threatened with fines for hiring illegal workers. Doesn’t work if you don’t enforce it.

This brings us to the great Republican divide on the issue. Conservatives, in general, are anti-immigrant for the same reasons they have always been anti-immigrant—a proud tradition in our nation of immigrants going back to the days of the Founders, when Ben Franklin thought we were going to be overrun by Germans. But Business likes illegal workers. The Chamber of Commerce lobbies for them. It’s lobbying now for a new bracero program. What a bonanza for Bidness.

Old-fashioned anti-immigrant prejudice always brings out some old-fashioned racists. This time around, they have started claiming that Mexicans can’t assimilate. A sillier idea I’ve never heard. Why don’t they come to Texas and meet up with Lars Gonzales, Erin Rodriguez and Bubba at the bowling alley. They can drink some Lone Star, listen to some conjunto and chill.

Racists seem obsessed by the idea that illegal workers—the hardest-working, poorest people in America—are somehow getting away with something, sneaking goodies that should be for Americans. You can always avoid this problem by having no social services. This is the refreshing Texas model, and it works a treat.

Aren’t y’all grateful that we’re down here doing exactly nothing for the people of our state, legal or illegal? Think what a terrible message it would send if you swapped Texas with Vermont, and they all got healthcare. In Texas, we never worry about illegals taking advantage of social benefits provided by our taxpayers. Incredibly clever, no?

One nice thing about the benefit of long experience with la frontera is that we in Texas don’t have to run around getting all hysterical about immigrants. The border is porous. When you want cheap labor, you open it up; when you don’t, you shut it down. It works to our benefit—it always has.


Molly Ivins is the former editor of the liberal monthly The Texas Observer. She is the bestselling author of several books including Who Let the Dogs In?

Friday, April 14, 2006

Goethe Posted by Picasa

Yep !!

(a ukethanks to Sondra)




"Treat people as if they
were what they ought to be,
and you will help them
become what they are
capable of becoming."


------------ JohannWolfgang von Goethe
 Posted by Picasa

Bush & Blair Love Video

'ats righto, Folks !

Click here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Dtd83dOGls&search=bush

- Uke Man

Thursday, April 13, 2006

Bob Fitrakis

 Posted by Picasa

The*Free*Press -------------------------Speaking Truth to Power

Hey Folks,

The "FREEP" takes on the unholy, totalitarian alliance of pulpit, corporation and the military:

Are mainstream churches finally standing up to the GOP’s hateful “Christian” blitzkrieg?

by Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman - April 9, 2006
in The*Free*Press - http://www.freepress.org/


Right-wing church movements have been a staple of American politics since well before the 1692 witch trials at Salem. But only in the past few decades has the extremist church served as the grassroots base for a new breed of corporate totalitarianism. That unholy union has been nowhere more powerful than here in Ohio, and it has finally provoked a response from the state’s mainstream churches.

With huge torrents of cash from Richard Mellon Scaife, the Ahmanson family and other super-rich ultra-rightists, the fundamentalist church has formed the popular network that has spawned the Bush catastrophe. The totalitarian alliance between pulpit, corporation and military is unique in U.S. history.

With contempt for the Constitution, and unholy opposition to separation of church and state, ultra-rich ultra-right preachers like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, self-proclaimed messiahs like Rev. Moon, and sanctimonious errand boys like Ralph Reed and Grover Norquist, have turned America into a “Christo-fascist” empire whose twice-unelected executive claims Divine right to rule. When it comes to their views on violence, empire, greed and intolerance, these are the most un-Christian men in America. It’s no accident that George W. Bush’s first words about the war to follow 9/11 had to do with a “Christian Crusade” against Islam. And, instead of consulting his father, a former President, W. chose to consult “a higher father.”

That this evil network of mega- churches, cults and electronic Elmer Gantrys would prove profoundly corrupt should also come as no surprise. These are the moneychangers that Christ kicked out of the temple. The ultra-orthodox cash flow from Jack Abramson to “godly” legislators like Tom DeLay and Ohio’s Bob Ney has suffered not the slightest diversion toward true spirituality. The movement even has its own sex symbol in Ann Coulter, the “Harlot of Hate” who reaps huge sums in places like Ohio’s World Harvest Church for talking nasty while dressed in mini-skirts that would get minors arrested off urban street corners.

The real mystery in all this has been an almost total silence from the religious mainstream. In recent months a number of statements have finally come from interdenominational organizations worrying deeply about global warming. The desecration of God’s Creation is pretty far along. But the liberal denominations finally seem to see the curse of CO2.

The liberal United Church of Christ is also finally questioning the theft of Christ’s legacy for ungodly GOP purposes. The idea that Jesus would hate gays, not want them to marry, love the death penalty and sanction wholesale slaughter in oil-rich nations has always stretched the imagination even of the irreligious. Finally, the actually religious seem to be speaking out.

In Ohio, the battle has actually hit the courts. More than fifty Columbus-area clergy have signed formal complaints with the Internal Revenue Service demanding an investigation of the practices of two extremist churches in regards to their tax exempt status. The two documents charge that the World Harvest Church and Fairfield Christian Church have functioned as de facto campaign organizations for the gubernatorial campaign of J. Kenneth Blackwell, Ohio’s GOP Secretary of State. Blackwell served as co-chair of Ohio 2004’s Bush-Cheney campaign while simultaneously managing the vote count.

Thirty-one pastors filed a preliminary complaint on January 16. The sequel, with an additional 25 signatories, accuses World Harvest and Fairfield Christian of six instances of illegally aiding Blackwell’s current campaign for governor. “Something as ordinary as rules for the activities of tax-exempt organizations must not be abused for the political gratification of any power, political or religious,” said the Rev. Al Debelak at a recent press conference. Debelak is pastor of Columbus’s Redeemer Lutheran Church.

The pastors cite three instances in which Blackwell admits to being the only invited candidate at church-sponsored rallies. Blackwell was also the only politician at church-sponsored rallies for Issue One, the 2004 referendum that banned gay marriages in Ohio. Blackwell also ran the Issue One campaign, in part, out of his secretary of state’s office.

Blackwell has become very public in his close friendship with the Rev. Rod Parsley, World’s Harvest’s ultra-right preacher who has grown ultra-rich in the leadership of his huge congregation. Blackwell’s trips on Parsley’s private plane are among the partisan favors cited. “This latest complaint filed by a group of left-leaning clergy amounts to nothing more than a campaign of harassment,” says a World Harvest statement. “For this group, especially members of the clergy, to engage in outright falsehoods for the sake of a political agenda is unconscionable.”

World Harvest gained notoriety in the 2004 election for its abundant electronic voting machines while there were seven-hour lines in Columbus’s inner city. A polling station at a Falwell-related fundamentalist church in nearby Gahanna became infamous when 4,258 votes were counted for George W. Bush in a precinct where 638 people voted. This became known worldwide as the “loaves and fishes” vote count precinct. The Blackwell-orchestrated election drew similar scorn when at Mt. Vernon Nazarene College, a fundamentalist college in Gambier, had a five-minute wait to vote, while students from nearby Kenyon College had to wait eleven hours.

Big fundamentalist money has also surfaced in the voting machine industry through the Ahmanson family, tied deeply into ES&S, the nation’s biggest voting machine company. Ohio Congressman Bob Ney’s ties to Jack Abramson, ES&S and the Ahmansons have also surfaced in his sponsorship of the Help America Vote Act, that has forced hundreds of millions of federal dollars to be spent installing nontransparent electronic voting machines throughout the US.

Like Ney, Blackwell has managed to step deep into the world of potentially actionable corruption. Since attempting the give the Diebold Company an unbid $100 million voting machine contract in Ohio, it has surfaced that Blackwell has owned shares in Diebold. The conflict of interest was deepened in 2005 when Blackwell brought in millions of dollars worth of Diebold machines which may have been used to seal the defeat of two election reform ballot issues. Three Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) election officials have now been officially charged with rigging the 2004 vote count, and more indictments are expected.

Though Blackwell is a candidate in the upcoming May 2 primary, he will once again administer the election. At this moment, he has stored in his office the memory cards for all the machines that will be used to count that vote.

Blackwell has also now revealed that he owns stock in the world’s largest manufacturer of gambling machines, even though part of his courtship with the fundamentalist churches has been an aggressive, outspoken opposition to gambling. Blackwell’s office says there is no conflict of interest here. But the professions of extreme fundamentalist faith, crucial to his race for governor, have been tainted.

Republican control of Ohio’s governorship is a critical piece of what happens to the presidency in 2008. The 20 electoral votes stolen in 2004 by Blackwell, Parsley and the rest of the Republican fundamentalist network gave George W. Bush a second term. No Republican has ever won the White House without carrying Ohio.

That mainstream churches here and around the United States are finally standing up to the theocratic fundamentalism that has produced “Christo-fascist” politicians like Blackwell may represent a critical swing of the political pendulum. The challenge to the powerful World Harvest’s tax status can only embolden churches that actually endorse the US Constitution.

With that might come at last, in Ohio and elsewhere, a spiritual counterweight desperately needed to help restore American democracy and the blessings of separation of church and state.


--Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman are co-authors of HOW THE GOP STOLE AMERICA’S 2004 ELECTION & IS RIGGING 2008, available at www.freepress.org. They are co-editors, with Steve Rosenfeld, of the upcoming WHAT HAPPENED IN OHIO?, from the New Press.
 Posted by Picasa
 Posted by Picasa

Bushie the Bubble Boy

Hey Folks,

Dubya, it's said, lives in a bubble, protected from the outside world.

Well, he fell out.

Click here:
http://www.planetdan.net/pics/misc/georgie.htm

- Uke Man

Passover

A Happy Passover Song!!

http://www.passovergreeting.com/


Shalom aleichem - Uke Man

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Bucolic Cincinnati

 Posted by Picasa

iss-Thay eye-Gay is-a ucking-Fay upid-Stay !!

Hey Folks,

You don't have to Be Crazy to live in the Cincinnati area, but it helps. Just consider the inbred state representative from Hamilton County, Courtney Combs - check out his confidence-inspiring picture at:

http://www.house.state.oh.us/jsps/MemberDetails.jsp?DISTRICT=54

At that site you'll also see:

City: Hamilton
Occupation: Realtor
Education: Graduate - Real Estate Institute

Well, we all know that you can trust a realtor, especially one with a degree from "The Real Estate Institute."


Anyway, Cincinnati, home of flying pigs on high pedestals, police murders of Blacks, the crusade against smut and Larry Flint (they get their smut across the river in morally-depraved Kentucky), the home of homophobia (see Maplethorpe), home (ironically) of "the REDS" (in the 50's they insisted the boys be called "the Redlegs") whose now-deceased owner revered her nazi memorabilia, has produced a fine representative in Courtney Combs.

Ironically, in trying to get a picture of this guy that would work with my blog software (sorry, I failed - hence the link above), pictures of Courtney Love modeling clothes half-off came up. She looks pretty dumb, but she couldn't be any dumber than our very own Courtney.

Well, getting to the point, the illustrious Mr. Combs recently made the front page of the Dispatch doing his duty to keep Ohio pure: he wants to make English Ohio's official language.

No xenophobia there. No racism there. No simple-minded "problem-solving" there. No! This is an action that would make the Board of Regents at any Institute of Higher (priced) Real Estate proud (would YOU want to live next door to someone who talks Mexican?).

Gosh ! What a great idea. Now if we can only make PIG-Latin the official language of the Ohio Legislature, all will be right with the world.

- Uke Man
 Posted by Picasa

Dispatch - Liberal or Conservative ?

Hey Folks,

Here's my letter to Ben Marrison, editor of the Dispatch:



Dear Mr. Marrison,

Several times recently you have pointed out that the Dispatch has been criticized for being both "too conservative" and "too liberal." Numerous times over the years, I've heard similar reports from Dispatch spokesmen; and I believe them.

I don't remember, though, any spokesman ever spelling out exactly what he thought the fact of those criticisms meant. That was left up to the reader, as in your recent column:

"When Dispatch staffers interviewed about 800 readers recently, asking questions to gauge how we’re doing as a newspaper and how we can improve, we were given slightly more B’s than A’s for our overall quality. There were a smattering of C’s and a handful of D’s, and two of you gave us F’s — one for being too liberal, the other for being too conservative.
(Insert pregnant pause here.)" (emphasis added)

I understand the "pause," but not it's meaning. Does it mean something like "See, the Dispatch is objective, neither Liberal nor Conservative" ; or does it mean something like, "One or both of the guys who gave us an F don't understand what constitutes "Liberal" and/or "Conservative"?

I hope you meant something like the latter. If so, I understand reluctance to point out a reader's ignorance. On the other hand, if you meant to imply that the paper is objective, neither Liberal nor Conservative, I think that is unjustified.

In this "market" it wouldn't be surprising to hear Blackwell supporters call Petro "liberal" (they've already charged the Dispatch with "favoring" Petro - is "A=B=C=Liberal" next? ). Our Republican senator and former governor, George Voinovich, actually was called a "Liberal" by Ohio University "economist" (and occasional Dispatch columnist) Richard Vedder.

So, even if the paper were a little to the right of Voinovich, it would be seen - by some zealots - as "Liberal." Of course, it isn't.

To determine the paper's position on the political spectrum, one must observe the entire spectrum - not just the narrow band observed by quacks like Vedder.

Obviously, the Dispatch editorial practice is conservative - not extremely so; more a Libertarian, business-oriented, "family empire," "country-club-Republican" conservatism. That's the reality; it's been demonstrated over and over again, not by what Richard Vedder or Tom Harker say about the Dispatch, but by what it actually does.

Yours - Tom Harker

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

Live Long and Prosper

In Peace Posted by Picasa

Thomas Worthington

Hey Folks,

The Old Guy had a wonderful time at Thomas Worthington High School today!!!!

Having taught for thirty-one years before retiring six years ago, I miss talking with young people. They are more open, more curious, more concerned, more thoughtful, more imaginative than their elders ( elders who admonish us all to NEVER discuss religion or politics).

Thank God for young minds! In today's insane world SOMEONE must discuss religion and politics before we end up in a theocratic dictatorship or fighting World War III.

All around the world fundamentalists of various religious orientation and messianic political leaders with visions of glory are actively attempting to impose their will on everyone else.

Some of us oldies DO think about and act upon all this; but the hope of the world is in the youth.

Thanks, Thomas Worthington, for allowing me the privilege of spending time with you!

Yours - Uke Man

Mission (from god) Accomplished

 Posted by Picasa

Maureen, Mark, Luke, and John

Divine Right of Bushes
By MAUREEN DOWD
(a ukethanks to Phyll)

So the aide turns out to have been loyally following his leader's dictates,rather than going around the boss's back to peddle secret information.

Scooter is a "good Judas," as it turns out, just as Judas himself was, accordingto a 1,700-year-old Christian manuscript found in the Egyptian desert that asserts that Jesus wanted Judas to betray him, so he entrusted his disciple with special intelligence.

"You can see how early Christians could say, if Jesus' death was all part ofGod's plan, then Judas's betrayal was part of God's plan," Dr. Karen King, a professor of the history of early Christianity at Harvard Divinity School, told The Times.

Since President Bush seems to see his mission in Iraq as part of God's plan, he must have assumed that getting Scooter Libby to leak parts of a classified document on Iraq to rebut Joe Wilson's charge about a juiced-up casus belli was part of God's plan.

When other officials leak top-secret stuff — even in cases where the whistle-blowers feel they are illuminating unlawful acts — they are portrayed by the White House as traitors who should be investigated and fired.

After The Times broke the story about the president allowing unauthorized snooping in America, W. was outraged. The F.B.I. and Justice Department were sicced on the leakers. "Revealing classified information," W. huffed, "is illegal, alerts our enemies and endangers our country."

Really, W. should fire himself. He swore to look high and low for the scurrilous leaker and, lo and behold, he has himself in custody. Since the Bush administration is basically a monarchy, he should pass the crown to Jenna. She couldn't do worse than this bunch of airheads and bullies.

Patrick Fitzgerald filed court papers indicating that Scooter testified that in 2003, when the White House was getting rattled by the failure to find W.M.D. and by criticism from a former diplomat on the margins of the war scheme, the president authorized Dick Cheney to authorize Scooter to make a one-sided dump of classified information about Saddam's arsenal to The Times's Judy Miller.

Scooter was so concerned about the propriety of the deal that he checked with the vice president's lawyer, David Addington, before he spilled. Addington,whose politics are to the right of Louis XVI, said, go right ahead. Now BlackAdder has Scooter's job. Coincidence?

The Bushies once more showed incompetence by creating this elaborate daisy-chain leak and giving it to the one person in journalism who had been roped off from writing about the prewar intelligence, while her editors sorted out problems with her past W.M.D. coverage. Judy never authored an article about what Scooter gave her, either that intelligence or the identity of the woman whom she wrote down in her notebook as "Valerie Flame." (Stripper or spy?)

W. subscribes to the Nixonian theory that when a president does it, it's not illegal — or maybe it's the divine right of kings. God has been pretty active in Republican politics lately: Tom DeLay said God told him to drop out of his re-election race.

If the administration were seriously trying to declassify something in the national interest, wouldn't it have President Bush explain his decision or have his Scottish terrier yip it out from the podium, rather than having Scooter whisper it in Judy's ear?

Instead, sounding very Lewis Carroll, the White House claims that when the president leaks something secret, it's not secret anymore. It's the Immaculate Declassification: intelligence is declassified by passing it on to a friendly reporter.

"The president believes the leaking of classified information is a very serious matter," Scott McClellan said. "And I think that's why it's important to draw a distinction here. Declassifying information and providing it to the public, when it is in the public interest, is one thing. But leaking classified information that could compromise our national security is something that is very serious.And there is a distinction." And thank goodness we have a White House that gets that distinction. Democrats who don't, he sniffed, are guilty of "crass politics."

If W. wants the information out, it's good for the country to make it public. If W. doesn't want the information out, it's bad for the country to make it public. L'état, c'est moi.

That's how we got mired in the Iraq war in the first place. The administration ruthlessly held back classified information that contradicted its bogus case for war, and leaked classified information that supported it.

The Bushies keep trying to manipulate reality, but reality bites back. That's not only crass politics. It's lethal politics. L'état, c'est mess.

Monday, April 10, 2006

"Damn, Chief !! Don't that beat all !!"

"You know Jack Abramoff,
an' I never heard of him!!Posted by Picasa

Bush on "Tribal Sovereignty" - Video

It's what Jack Abramoff told him to say:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQDxfg3RQwc&search=bush
"Wonder what tribe he's in . . ." Posted by Picasa

"Permitalos a comer frijoles."

I c'n talk Mexican !" (hee-hee-smirk-smirk)  Posted by Picasa

Profit over People

Hey Folks,

On April 7 Douglas Southgate, a professor in the Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics at Ohio State University wrote a column, "Demographics eventually will stem flow of illegal aliens" in the Columbus Dispatch. (for the entire column see: http://www.ukuleleman.net/2006/03/friday-april-07-2006-douglas-southgate.html ).

In my opinion, he basically was arguing for the "illegal immigrant" status quo. It's been wisely said that every system is designed to give the exact results it gives - regardless of official claims to the contrary. We have an "illegal alien problem" because those pulling the levers of power WANT one.

Illegal Mexican workers are here, and in great numbers, because people with money personally benefit from their presence. The recent dust-up causes the favored class a problem. Their most helpful servants, the Republicans, have a split constituency: xenophobic conservatives who want every Mexican deported and profit-loving country-clubbers who drool over the thought of twice as many illegals to exploit.

Southgate's column seemed aimed at calming both sides' fears without really changing much about what he called "a bilateral relationship that is important to us in a myriad of ways."

Not much in that to rile the Uke Man. I expect the Dispatch to put out that line, and most economists measure everything from the viewpoint of the wealthy exploiters.

However, one comment he made regarding young Mexican workers, led me to write him:

"Better mannered than young Frenchmen, they do not respond to economic adversity by rioting. Instead, they decamp for the United States, where the work that awaits them offers wages that are attractive by Mexican standards."

He responded to my letter, and I wrote again. Here is the correspondence.

- Uke Man




Dear Professor Southgate,

Your gratuitous comment about Mexican youth being more mannerly in the face of economic exploitation (you called it "economic adversity") than the French youth who rioted against it, brought to mind several quotations from Oscar Wilde:

"We are often told that the poor are grateful for charity. Some of them are, no doubt, but the best amongst the poor are never grateful. They are ungrateful, discontented, disobedient, and rebellious. They are quite right to be so."

"As for the virtuous poor, one can pity them, of course, but one cannot possibly admire them."

Well, I don't expect you will agree with Wilde's view. Moreover, I wonder whether you can truly understand it.

Yours - Tom Harker



Sir,

Why is it that some people suppose that folks with different views are intellectual
[sic] wanting? This [sic] the clear implication of the last sentence in your note.

But let's stick to facts. Young Frenchmen are protesting against a measure that would obviously create employment opportunities for them. [The unemployment rate for their age cohort is 25 percent (and about 50 percent for young immigrants); this is mainly because employers are unable to run the risk of hiring people without experience, given the various and costly indemnifications that existing French laws mandate for discharged workers.] They are not poor, but instead are middle-class students, who have imbibed deeply of globophobism.

As my column indicates, young people who look hard for work are more deserving of respect than their privileged counterparts in a much wealthier country who riot.It is nice to be able to quote someone like Oscar Wilde, but best to do so when and where the situation fits.

Respectfully,
Douglas Southgate



Dear Professor Southgate,

I am in complete agreement as to adhering to facts, and thank you for appreciating my familiarity with Wilde.

I do believe it a fact that you and I have different views on a number of things, but it is not true that in my earlier letter I found you to be intellectually wanting. Rather, I intended to give you the benefit of the doubt.

The notion that the poor are not the cause of their own dilemma is so foreign to our capitalistic mindset that I, perhaps naively, thought you might find Wilde's comments to be gibberish. It seemed to me that anyone who could understand them would hold a position different from yours. I guess you understand Wilde's intent but disagree. Unlike Wilde you are able to admire the "virtuous poor."

You have every right to this position, but historically it has been consistently used as the justification for exploitation. Those who make the argument are those who benefit from it. I find it difficult to understand why those who are called upon to accept the degradation this argument imposes should be admired for embracing it.

In regard to the French youth and the relevance of Wilde's comments, let me say that I was, in general, aware of the "facts" you shared pertinent to the recent protests. Yes, French youth do suffer some because of unemployment; that is a fact. Most likely, the proposed scheme would lead - at least for a while - to less unemployment (i.e. more youth would have some sort of job); I believe that is a fact.

I do not agree, however, that this increased employment is in fact an "opportunity." The real opportunity this measure provides is to further reduce the influence and living standards of working people. This is an opportunity, not for the workers, but for the businesses you mention.

Neither is it a fact that "employers are unable to run the risk of hiring people without experience, given the various and costly indemnifications that existing French laws mandate for discharged workers" (emphasis added).

Saying employers "can't" is an opinion; employers "won't" is a fact. It's a nice racket too.

It's always the same: Capital says to Labor, "We'll let you work if you let us degrade you; we must maintain our status, and you must concede some of yours for that to happen. The Mexicans, degraded in their own country as a result of the economic system, are granted the "opportunity" to work here illegally for slave wages while subject to unbelievable exploitation - but unlike the French, they show good manners and say "Thank you."

I understand that the similarity of middle class French protesters and poor Mexicans working here illegally might not be obvious to most economists, but they are just two sides of the same coin. The Mexicans are "allowed" their economic "opportunity" because it serves the elite and undercuts the indigenous working class. Moreover, the Mexicans come into this "opportunity" at such a low level that they feel lucky to be abused.

Likewise, the French middle class are "allowed" their economic "opportunity" because it serves the elite and undercuts the working class. Unlike the Mexicans, however, the French have had a taste of human dignity and respect; historically, people have been less dominated by profit there. They are not saying "thank you" for their "opportunity" to start the race to the bottom.

This was written in the Saturday business section of the Dispatch:

"Average weekly earnings of non supervisory workers increased by an unimpressive 0.2 percent, which might be bad for workers, but which stock and bond markets interpreted as good news because it suggests wage inflation is restrained."

There you go; another "opportunity." If American workers - unlike those spoiled, ungrateful French kids - say "thank you," one can pity them, of course, but one cannot possibly admire them.

Yours - Tom Harker

Sunday, April 09, 2006

 Posted by Picasa

Is Bush Drinking Again - Video

Hey ...hic ... Folks,

Yoo jush gotta shee thish ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15DSJX4jVBo&search=bush

- Uke ... burp ... Man

"I Met a Seer"

 Posted by Picasa

My Visits To Worthington High Schools

Hey Folks,

As mentioned in an earlier post, I am fortunate enough to speak four times a year at Worthington High Schools to their "political radicalism" classes where a series of radical speakers - the entire spectrum from Left to Right - step onto the soap box. This week I'm off to Thomas Worthington, a venerable old school near where I went to high school (yep, it's that old).

I always suggest that the students listen carefully to the speakers but not believe anything they say – including me. I tell them nobody knows any more about the important aspects of life than they do.

Experts claim to know everything, but can never agree on anything; they aren't really seeking reality or trying to solve a problem; they're proselytizing. Hear what they say, but think for yourself.

This confuses some students because of the seeming paradox:

I tell them not to believe any of us, but if they take that advice, then they are believing me.

Aha!! It must be a trick the crafty Uke Man is pulling on them! He really means: "Listen to me and not the others!"

Well, I guess it could look like that, and of course I hope they will find some sense in what I present, but actually I do mean for them to listen and decide for themselves.

Sure, like all the other speakers I think I am extremely wise and have a muscular half-nelson on the infinite - don't we all? But at the same time, I am convinced that each of us must find wisdom for ourselves.

We can help one another find the path and set out in promising directions, but we cannot hand wisdom to anyone. This truth is supported by even the most cursory consideration of advertising and politics, both of which concentrate on manipulating us rather than relying upon our wisdom. Manipulation is much easier and more succesful in "selling" the "product" (see H.L. Mencken).

There is no paradox. I don't want the students to "believe" me. My advice might be wise (I think it is), but it is worthless unless one sees the wisdom for oneself. Otherwise, it's like believing, after reading a few copies of "The Las Vegas Adviser," that you can beat the casinos.

Steven Crane spoke to this matter in a poem:

I met a seer.
He held in his hands
The book of wisdom.
"Sir," I addressed him,
"Let me read."
"Child-" he began.
"Sir," I said,
"Think not that I am a child,
For already I know much
Of that which you hold.
Aye, much."

He smiled,
Then he opened the book
And held it before me. -
Strange that I should have grown so suddenly blind.


- Uke Man

Saturday, April 08, 2006

Bush & Sprout

 Posted by Picasa

More on McCain (from Briopia)

Hey Folks,

John McCain will be in Columbus soon for the OSU graduation. We need to be aware of just how big and dangerous a phoney this guy really is!!

If enough of us learn, maybe we'll do something about it.

More later.

- Uke Man

Headline from the Future -- June 15, 2006: McCain Announces He Has Been "Born Again."
(from "Briopia" http://briopia.blogspot.com/2006/04/headline-from-future-june-15-2006.html

John McCain was on Meet the Press yesterday. In a rare demonstration of candor, McCain, in the midst of a colossal display of double-speak, back-tracking, flip-flopping, and metaphorical Bush-hugging, told Russert: "Look, we all say things that are stupid. I’m going to probably say several more this morning, . . ." Sure, ostensibly, he was specifically talking about WPE's statement about having looked into Putin's soul, but McCain's brain, which apparently is currently being held hostage by his desperate Presidential ambitions, managed to squeak out the desperate plea for help that was that second sentence.

McCain did say a number of very stupid things:

Exhibit 1: McCain said that Bush "has been laying out fairly eloquently the challenge that we face in Iraq and the consequences of it."

Exhibit 2: McCain said "I am confident that this administration will exhaust every effort before contemplating seriously a military option." Riiiiight. Because history demonstrates that they always do that.

Exhibit 3: McCain said that no one in Washington knows more about the issue of immigration than George W. Bush.

Exhibit 4: McCain said, to explain his flip-flop on the Bush tax cut, "First of all, on the tax cuts. I do not believe in tax increases. Now, it was a gimmick that was—that the tax cuts were temporary and then had to be made permanent. The tax cuts are now there and voting to revoke them would have been to—not to extend them would have meant a tax increase. I’ve never voted for a tax increase in my life."

Exhibit 5: Well, Exhibit 5 will be a lot more fun if we say a few things first:

On February 29, 2000, McCain said: "Neither party should be defined by pandering to the outer reaches of American politics and the agents of intolerance whether they be Louis Farrakhan or Al Sharpton on the left, or Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell on the right."

Yesterday, after McCain attempted to explain to Tim Russert why he agreed to be the commencement speaker this year at Falwell's Liberty University, Russert and McCain had this exchange:

MR. RUSSERT: Do you believe that Jerry Falwell is still an agent of intolerance?
SEN. McCAIN: No, I don’t. I think that Jerry Falwell can explain to you his views on this program when you have him on.


Well, gee, why has McCain changed his mind about Falwell? Since McCain, who (according to the media narrative is a "straight-shooting," "truth-telling," "maverick-Republican") also said yesterday that he has not decided to run for President and will not decide until 2007, it cannot be that McCain is flip-flopping on Falwell in order to try and pander to the Religious Right as he gears up for GOP presidential primary battles. So, I guess it must be that Falwell has changed over the last 6 years.

Let's check that out:First, Russert started a few steps down this path by pointing out that:

MR. RUSSERT: After September 11th, let me show you what...

SEN. McCAIN: Go ahead. Yeah.

MR. RUSSERT: ...Reverend Falwell had to say. “What we saw on [September 11th], as terrible as it is, could be miniscule if, in fact, God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve. ... I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists and the feminists, and the gays and lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle ... I point the finger in their face and say, ‘You helped this happen.’”


But, there are so many more Falwell statements that have occurred since then and that Russert could have put up on the video screen:

In October 2002, Falwell called Mohammed a terrorist.

In March 2004, during a radio interview, Falwell, after remarkably explaining that Jesus really wasn't all that big of a proponent of the philosophy of turning the other cheek, said that: "What we need to do is take the battle to the Muslim heathens and do unto them before they do unto us."

In July 2004, Falwell equated same-sex marriage to slavery.

In early November 2004, on CNN, Falwell said that Bush should, w/r/t terrorists, "blow them all away in the name of the Lord."

On November 21, 2004, Falwell called the National Organization of Women the National Organization of Witches.

On March 2, 2006, Falwell felt it necessary to issue a correction so that no one would misunderstand that he truly does not believe that Jews or Muslims will go to heaven.

In his March 5, 2006 sermon, Falwell said that he wanted his "people to be the most intolerant people in the world." Well, so much for the notion that Falwell has changed since 2000 so as to no longer be fairly called an agent of intolerance.

I guess McCain's just a lil' pander bear.

W/r/t Russert, he actually did a decent job of confronting McCain on a number of issues. But, it would have been nice if Russert had followed up by asking McCain about whether he still thinks that Pat Robertson or Al Sharpton or Louis Farrakhan are agents of intolerance.

posted by Brian @ 9:48 AM

Friday, April 07, 2006

"Do unto others efficiently"

Hey, it's just business, pal! Posted by Picasa

What Stocks Would Jesus Own ?

Hey Folks,

I have been puzzled for some time over the fact that so many people claim to be both devout Christians and avid Capitalists. Regardless of how one may feel about either orientation, combining the two seems impossible - by definition.

One can be an avid Capitalist and a back-sliding Christian or a devout Christian and a half-hearted Capitalist; serving one of these masters while giving lip service to the other. But one CANNOT serve both; they are - by their natures - mutually exclusive.

Christianity is based on the life of Jesus, and in the Bible - the Christians' holy book - Jesus said:

“Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them." Matt.7:12

which is often stated: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you," an ancient bit of wisdom that can be easily understood by almost anyone. That is: "Treat other people the way you would like to be treated."

According to the Bible, Jesus also said:

"Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. And again I say unto you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God." Matt. 19:23-24. *

He tells the rich young man with whom he is speaking:

"If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasures in heaven." Matt. 19:21

Seems pretty clear, doesn't it.



Now Capitalism is based on certain principles as well:

"Capitalism is commonly understood to mean an economic or socioeconomic system in which the means of production are predominantly privately owned and operated for profit, often through the employment of labour. Money mediates the distribution and exchange of goods, services, and labour in largely free markets. Decisions regarding investment are made privately, and production and distribution is primarily controlled by companies each acting in its own interest." **

By definition, Capitalism is guided by the private self-interest of individuals or groups of individuals and is dedicated to making and increasing profit for those individuals. The focus is on helping oneself, without regard to others.

We hear endlessly - and almost reverently - about "competition." Within "the Market" and at the mercy of its "invisible hand," capitalists strive to "out-compete" one another. Those who are most "efficient" prosper; the less "efficient" are eliminated. This is seen as beneficial and as it should be. Still, while driving others out of business, I doubt the "drivers" would have others do that to them.

Besides ruining competitor capitalists, it is also in the interest of more "efficient" capitalists to minimize "labor costs" - i.e. the standard of living enjoyed by those who labor for the capitalist. Thus, labor unions are to be avoided or made as impotent as possible - since every penny subtracted from the workers' pockets goes into the owner's. Hence also, the explosion of outsourcing to foreign countries where labor is even less valued than here.

Moreover, businesses don't necessarily fail or get outsourced because they aren't making a profit, but because they are not making a large enough profit. Profitable enterprises in this country have been moved to foreign countries and thousands of Americans left unemployed and without medical insurance simply to make wealthy people wealthier.

Seems pretty clear, doesn't it.

A true follower of Jesus seeks treasure in heaven for himself and for others; a capitalist wants it here, now, in ever greater quantities, for himself alone, and at others expense.

Cross a Christian with a Capitalist and you'll get a sad hybrid, some variety - depending on the mix - of that ancient abomination: the Hypocrite.


- Uke Man


* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_a_needle

** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

Thursday, April 06, 2006


Efficiency Experts Posted by Picasa

Mussolini got the trains to run on time !!!

Hey Folks,

Have you noticed? All the Republican talking heads describe Tom DeLay as an "EFFICIENT" leader.

Well, efficiency is all well and good if that's all you care about; but doesn't one need to consider the end to which the efficiency is applied? EFFICIENCY in the Mafia, the slave trade, robbing banks, and genocide - for just a few examples - is not to be celebrated.

The salient point is not DeLay's efficiency but his criminal, self-serving behavior - his being damned good at it (i.e. efficient) counts for nothing.

- Uke Man
 Posted by Picasa

"Send in the Clowns" - Peggy Lee ( more self-deluding doublethink)

Censure issue fading fast, but its cause is still grave concern
Wednesday, April 05, 2006

TOM TEEPEN

The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on a proposal to censure President Bush for his literally unwarranted domestic spying flopped on opening day, like the really bad play that it was.

The Republican members of course were having none of it and the hearing was snubbed by the committee’s Democratic heavy hitters: Sens. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, Dianne Feinstein of California, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Charles Schumer of New York and Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware. (Schumer’s absence was especially telling. One of the most dangerous spots on Earth is the space between Schumer and the nearest TV camera.)

So the resolution will go nowhere. That was its sure fate from the moment Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., kited it and the reason so many of his colleagues found other chores for the day. Even so, censure is called for, if not formally, then broadly and emphatically.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act plainly requires warrants for such eavesdropping. The judges overseeing it are not stingy with warrants, and the law makes room for red-hot cases that need immediate action; warrants can be secured after the fact.

Bush instead insists the law doesn’t apply to him because as commander in chief he has wartime power to ignore any law he finds bothersome. An inconvenient statute against torturing prisoners? Poof, it is blown away, like a dandelion gone to seed.

Bush’s two attorneys general – first John Ashcroft and now Alberto Gonzales – have shilled for this astonishing assertion.

Although he came to office championing, he said, humility, Bush and those dancing court to him have come up with the scary concept of the "unitary executive" or "unitary presidency" – meaning, in effect, that he can do whatever he jolly well pleases.

From just moments after 9/11, Bush has said this war will take long years and we probably won’t even know exactly when it has ended. That sounds right.

Maybe one day, then, someone will say to somebody else: "You know, we haven’t had any terrorism for years. Maybe that war is over." And if one of the people in the conversation is president, the war will be over.

So Bush has claimed for himself and his successors a right to rule by fiat. The title for that sort of ruler is more nearly caesar than president.

Perhaps the most amazing part of this business is the apparent fact that the American people don’t give a rat’s tail. Anyone who might have had a twinge of concern at first was yelled down preemptively by right-wing and/or Republican spielers, not only, but not least, either, on talk radio. And a general attitude seems to have settled in that all politics is piffle, so what difference could any of it make?

This is civic debauchery. Citizenship is reduced to spectator sport, to be enjoyed or disdained according to the partisan predisposition of the onlookers and the fights in the audience are part of the show. The Internet has become a theater of attitudinal exhibitionism and social voyeurism.

So Bush gets away with claiming powers to imprison suspects indefinitely just on his say-so, to brush off Congress and its laws and to override generations-old treaties – all under the empowering colors of his unitary presidency.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the circus. Enjoy yourselves.

Tom Teepen writes for Cox News Service.
teepencolumn@coxnews.com
 Posted by Picasa
"No!!" . . . "no,no,no,no,,no!!!" Posted by Picasa

Just Say "No"

Hey Folks,

For some fun, click here:

http://www.yucs.org/~ephraim/bushlip/

- Uke Man (a ukethanks to John)

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

 Posted by Picasa

Tuesday, April 04, 2006

Gay-Friendly WAL-MART Too !!! (who would have guessed?)

Hey Folks,

Will wonders never cease?

I just heard it reported that Capitalist-Pig WAL-MART has stuck its tongue out at the Christo-Fascist Right and refused to ban Brokeback Mountain from their virginal shelves.

My dog!!! What is the world coming to?

Do those corporate vampires love Mammon more than God? Or do gays have enough spending power to overcome WAL-MART's family/Christian/American/homophobic scruples?

You tell me (but don't have Ken Blackwell oversee the vote on his Diebold machines).

- Uke Man

It's a Man-date created in Heaven !!

 Posted by Picasa

Breaking News - The Truth At Last

Hey Folks,

I heard it from the man himself, Tom "5 second" Delay, right on "Hardball."

God has commanded Mr. Delay to love Barney Frank !!

It's about time! Maybe he'll stop screwing gays and start loving them!

- Uke Man
 Posted by Picasa

"A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" Compilation

Hey Folks,

The complete Twain Postings are now available. You can read the whole thing or any part of it at:

http://www.ukuleleman.net/2006/03/complete-twain-postings.html


I've posted it, but far below because it is so long (short compared to the actual text). It's tucked safely away back on March 20, 2006. If you're interested, just click above. If you missed it, take a look.

I'll be commenting periodically in the future, using some part of the story as inspiration, and I'll probably quote a bit from A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court.

Whenever I do this, I will include the link to the entire compilation (see above).

- Uke Man
 Posted by Picasa

Just in from the Ministry of Truth

Hey Folks,

Yesterday I posted (directly below) "The Damned Human Race" in which I discussed humankind's "power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them" - 1984.

This morning NPR news reported that:
the job situation has improved.

Reports indicated that:
employers were laying off workers more slowly

suggesting that:
they were holding off downsizing as long as possible.

There was a smile in the voice of the talking woman who read us the good news.

- Uke Man

Monday, April 03, 2006

"When we're talkin' about war
we're talkin' about peace" - GWB Posted by Picasa

"The Damned Human Race"

Hey Folks,

Every now and then I stop and consider the human race.

Mark Twain called us the "damned human race." H.L. Mencken said that no one ever went broke underestimating our intelligence. There's a joke about the earth being the insane asylum of the universe. Yep, that's us.

As a member in good standing of the asylum, I've resisted "adjustment," preferring to attempt a cure. Not an easy undertaking.

In my pursuit of sanity I have come to a couple fundamental observations. One is that the light is either on or it is off - it isn't both at the same time.

Now that might not seem very profound, but consider this from Nineteen Eighty-Four:

"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. ... To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies—all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth."

"Doublethink," while false to its core, is very comforting - in other words, it is a big help in our "adjusting" even while it removes us further from reality.

I believe I was told in freshman philosophy 101 that as long ago as Aristotle it was determined that something could not "be" and "not be" at the same time. So, our "damned," "stupid," "insane" retreat from reality is not the result of ignorance of the facts, but rather results from the denial of the facts. That denial is getting worse every day.

Most people, even right-wing nut-cases, understand this if the notion is presented in some historical context that presents no obvious challenge to contemporary "reality."

Few would object to criticism of numerous examples of doublethink connected to the Salem witch hysteria. For example, most would recognize the "denial" involved in the instance where a jury finds the defendant innocent, but "reconsiders" at the ininsistence of the judge when a mob outside the courthouse objects. Few would support the subsequent condemnation and hanging of the accused.

Unfortunately, the human race seems unable to practice the same, simple mental exexercise in contemporary matters. For example, we, the well-adjusted inmates of Bedlam, accepted each of Bush's sequential excuses for the war, keeping "the lie always one leap ahead of the truth." And we repeat this soothing therapy every day and in a myriad of ways. Moreover, the calming lies we tell one another are endlessly echoed and amplified by the media, itself caught up in self-help "adjustment."

Twain and Mencken were right if you ask me, and the joke has sense as well as humor.

Fortunately, another one of my fundamental observations offers some hope in the face of this depressing situation.

In my experience, when things get bad enough, the center will no longer hold and the universe of lies are flung from their orbits into a fittingly destructive vacuum,thus freeing us from our self-imposed hypnosis long enough to give it all another try.

That time might not be so very far away.

- Uke Man

Sunday, April 02, 2006

 Posted by Picasa

Is there a Ukulele Man & his Prodigal Sons - or a poem - In Your Future??

Hey Folks,


I guess I've been neglecting the "artsy" side of this blog, caught up so much in the frustrating world of Bush & Co, Neo-Coneheads, war-mongers, homophobes, xenophobes, fetus-jar weilders, bible-thumpers, and other good Americans working to establish their "values" here and around the world.

So, here's an update on what's happing in the Old Guy's world of uke and roll.

Tuesday, April 11
--- I'm off to Thomas Worthington High School with lip and uke to sing a bit and kick-off this semester's "Political Radicalism" class. I get to start because I'm the most level-headed radical around - I know that's hard to believe, but I'll share a bit of what I do and say there, once the day has arrived. You'll see !!!

Thursday, April 27 - Saturday April 29
--- I'm off to the Big Apple for the New York Uke Fest. I'm able to do this because of my good friend Mr. Ron Hester - artist, musician, singer/song-writer, photographer, graphic designer, and hard-working bon vivant - who lives there and can stand putting up with his ancient 8th grade Engish teacher for a couple days (don't ask me how he does it).

All my experience with New York City, I owe to Ron, and part of that experience helped write "Eldorado," the title song of the third album (coming out sometime during this century).

The NYUke Fest (www.nyukefest.com) runs from Thursday, April 27 through Sunday, April 30. I'll be part of the "Ukulele Cabaret" Thursday through Saturday nights (the Cabaret runs 8:00 to Midnight). Possibly, I will make one cameo appearance Friday afternoons (still looking into that).

Thursday, June 1
--- It's the Columbus Arts Fest ( http://www.gcac.org/fest/map.php ) - the Whole Band should be in attendance. We play on the Broad Street Stage, 11:30 - 12:45 - pack a lunch and come listen.

Saturday, June 3
--- Again at the Columbus Arts Fest ( http://www.gcac.org/fest/map.php ) - this time at the "Poetry Corner" tent location (near the intersection of Main Street and Civic Center Drive - I am very pleased to have been selected as a "featured reader" for the "Ohio Magazine"-sponsored poetry presentation - 5:30 to 5:45 p.m.

Later in June
--- We've applied to play at the COMFEST. Time will tell

In October
--- I will apply for Pumpkin Show one more time (If I don't get too old and forgetful by then).


Well, that's it for now. I'll blog-report on each of these misadventures as they transpire!

- Uke Man

Saturday, April 01, 2006

 Posted by Picasa

Spreading Darkness

Hey Folks,

I’m just a retired English teacher who plays the ukulele and puts out a blog. My political experience consists of voting regularly, being a leader of my local teachers’ union, listening to the news, and reading. Yet, for years I have been overwhelmed with the feeling that I knew much more than the talking pundit-heads we see on the “news” shows reporting the “news” and interviewing “important” people.

This feeling has been aroused over and over again by the failure of highly-paid, supposedly experienced and intelligent media ginks to question comments and positions that even I could see were variously non-responsive, incomplete, misleading, mistaken, or outright lies. It is frustrating and enraging to observe.

For most of my life I’ve labored under the misconception that the media’s job, its sacred responsibility, was to ferret out the TRUTH – not to give all sides “equal time” – not to “entertain” – not to pump up viewership, not to “maintain access” to powerful manipulators – not to advance one’s career and salary – but to ferret out the TRUTH.

It turns out that at one time this was – at least officially on paper – the media’s responsibility. No more.

from:

CJR - Columbia Journalism Review

Voices

Closing Ethical Loopholes
By Gilbert Cranberg

Journalism ethics codes are filled with advice to be accurate and to tell the truth, but no official code obligates the press to tell the truth about the exaggerations and outright falsehoods it quotes. The American Society of Newspaper Editors’ Statement of Principles is typical: “Every effort must be made to assure that the news content is accurate, free from bias, and in context, and that all sides are presented fairly.” By omitting any explicit duty to inform readers that what they just read was erroneous, the code enables a news organization to be in compliance so long as bogus claims are reported accurately.

For years, the Associated Press Managing Editors Association rejected that view. The ethics code in place at least since 1974 declared, “The newspaper should background, with the facts, public statements that it knows to be inaccurate or misleading.” The passage was dropped when APME rewrote the code in 1994 to make it, as David Hawpe, editorial director of the Louisville Courier-Journal who was then ethics committee chairman, “vaguely” recalls, “more operational, and less a statement of principle.”

Given that hoodwinking has become virtually a way of public life, something like the defunct APME language deserves to be dusted off, copied widely, and conscientiously applied.

To be sure, now and then reporters or editors do insert timely correctives. A January 14 New York Times story, for instance, quoted Dick Cheney’s claim in a speech that the projected shortfall in Social Security “exceeds $10 trillion,” and added immediately, “But that figure refers to a calculation of the shortfall over what economists call ‘an infinite time horizon.’ The standard figure for the shortfall, used by the Social Security trustees, is $3.7 trillion over 75 years.”

Such follow-on is the exception. It needs to be commonplace. Of course, shoring up the ASNE code won’t make it so, but it is an important symbolic step. Unless news organizations develop the competence and will to correct the record, the press [and, thereby, the public] will continue to be hornswoggled by the politicians.


Gilbert Cranberg, former editor of The Des Moines Register’s opinion pages, was a longtime member of ASNE’s Ethics and Values Committee.

- Uke Man


Mikey, he'll eat anything Posted by Picasa

Bozovich and Mikey

To the Editor,

I read in Friday's Dispatch editorial that one of Ohio's Republican senators, George V. Voinovich, thought the proposed censure of President Bush for illegally spying on Americans was a waste of time, that it interfered with working on important matters.

That should please our other Republican senator, Mike DeWine, who - according to a front page story - announced recently that he would "take a lead role in pushing for a [crucial] U.S. constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage."

Isn't it wonderful when our two boys play well together and have their priorities straight - er - in order. We'll be so proud of them when they grow up.

Yours - Tom Harker