Gays bad – Unless they’re Polygamists ??
Hey Folks,
Here’s how it works.
The Republicans have to beat-up Gays in order to divert attention from their destruction of America, its people, its children, and its future (see Reuters story below).
Arlen Specter a Republican committee chair with a moderate constituency has to obey his party and introduce the disgusting ban. While kissing the party ring, Specter hopes to avoid voter backlash by saying he opposes the ban he's introducing.
When Democratic Senator Russell Feingold walked out of the closed-door session, it made Specter look bad. Hence the cat-fight. Even Republican Sen. Orin “pencil-neck” Hatch, a Utah Mormon, got caught up in his party’s self-set snare.
Senat Democrat Patrick Leahy’s willingness to criticize Hatch’s support of polygamists can be directly traced to Republican Senator Rick Santorum’s famous claim that gay marriage would lead to polygamy (AND sex with dogs).
It is pathetic that the Republicans would denigrate so many good Americans for short term political gain. Both Specter and the bill’s sponsor know it won’t pass; it will just put them on record as hating gays – and that will help their party among certain knuckle-dragging constituencies.
- Uke Man
Senate panel OKs gay-marriage ban
By Andy Sullivan Thu May 18
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. Senate panel advanced a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage on Thursday as the committee chairman shouted "good riddance" to a Democrat who walked out of the tense session.
"If you want to leave, good riddance," The Senate Judiciary Chairman, Republican Arlen Specter, told Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Russell Feingold, who refused to participate because, he said, the meeting was not sufficiently open to the public.
"I've enjoyed your lecture too. See you later, Mr. Chairman," Feingold told the Pennsylvania senator before storming out of the private room where the meeting took place.
The testy exchange highlighted tensions over the proposal, which seeks to amend the U.S. Constitution to prevent states from recognizing same-sex marriages.
The measure passed 10-8 on a party-line vote. Specter said he voted for the amendment because he thought it should be taken up by the full Senate, even though he does not back it.
The gay-marriage ban is one of several hot-button social issues Republicans are raising to rally conservative voters ahead of November's congressional elections.
Because the measure seeks to change the Constitution, it must pass both houses of Congress by a two-thirds majority and then be approved by at least 38 states.
The Senate is expected to take up the bill in early June.
The bill's sponsor told reporters he does not expect it to pass the Senate but wanted to keep the issue in the public eye.
"If we quit bringing it up here and talking about it here, in effect we leave the decision-making process to the judicial side," Colorado Republican Sen. Wayne Allard (news, bio, voting record) said.
A similar effort failed in the Senate in 2004.
Gay marriage has been a hot topic since a Massachusetts court ruled in 2003 that the state legislature could not ban it, paving the way for America's first same-sex marriages in May the following year.
At least 13 states have passed amendments banning gay marriage while two -- Vermont and Connecticut -- have legalized civil unions. California, New Jersey, Maine, the District of Columbia and Hawaii each offer gay couples some legal rights as partners.
Legal challenges seeking permission for gays and lesbians to marry are pending in 10 states. Most recently, a Georgia state court struck down a state ban on Tuesday.
Just over half of all Americans oppose same-sex marriage, according to a March poll by the Pew Research center, down from 63 percent in February 2004.
Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy (news, bio, voting record), the committee's top Democrat, said the gay marriage ban was a waste of time for a committee that needs to tackle a wide range of other pressing issues, from judicial nominations to oversight of the National Security Administration's domestic-spying program.
"I didn't realize marriages were so threatened. Nor did my wife of 44 years," Leahy said.
Leahy said Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch (news, bio, voting record), who supports the ban, has expressed support for polygamists in his home state of Utah.
"I never said that," Hatch responded. "I know some (polygamists) that are very sincere. ... Don't accuse me of wanting to have polygamy."
Here’s how it works.
The Republicans have to beat-up Gays in order to divert attention from their destruction of America, its people, its children, and its future (see Reuters story below).
Arlen Specter a Republican committee chair with a moderate constituency has to obey his party and introduce the disgusting ban. While kissing the party ring, Specter hopes to avoid voter backlash by saying he opposes the ban he's introducing.
When Democratic Senator Russell Feingold walked out of the closed-door session, it made Specter look bad. Hence the cat-fight. Even Republican Sen. Orin “pencil-neck” Hatch, a Utah Mormon, got caught up in his party’s self-set snare.
Senat Democrat Patrick Leahy’s willingness to criticize Hatch’s support of polygamists can be directly traced to Republican Senator Rick Santorum’s famous claim that gay marriage would lead to polygamy (AND sex with dogs).
It is pathetic that the Republicans would denigrate so many good Americans for short term political gain. Both Specter and the bill’s sponsor know it won’t pass; it will just put them on record as hating gays – and that will help their party among certain knuckle-dragging constituencies.
- Uke Man
Senate panel OKs gay-marriage ban
By Andy Sullivan Thu May 18
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. Senate panel advanced a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage on Thursday as the committee chairman shouted "good riddance" to a Democrat who walked out of the tense session.
"If you want to leave, good riddance," The Senate Judiciary Chairman, Republican Arlen Specter, told Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Russell Feingold, who refused to participate because, he said, the meeting was not sufficiently open to the public.
"I've enjoyed your lecture too. See you later, Mr. Chairman," Feingold told the Pennsylvania senator before storming out of the private room where the meeting took place.
The testy exchange highlighted tensions over the proposal, which seeks to amend the U.S. Constitution to prevent states from recognizing same-sex marriages.
The measure passed 10-8 on a party-line vote. Specter said he voted for the amendment because he thought it should be taken up by the full Senate, even though he does not back it.
The gay-marriage ban is one of several hot-button social issues Republicans are raising to rally conservative voters ahead of November's congressional elections.
Because the measure seeks to change the Constitution, it must pass both houses of Congress by a two-thirds majority and then be approved by at least 38 states.
The Senate is expected to take up the bill in early June.
The bill's sponsor told reporters he does not expect it to pass the Senate but wanted to keep the issue in the public eye.
"If we quit bringing it up here and talking about it here, in effect we leave the decision-making process to the judicial side," Colorado Republican Sen. Wayne Allard (news, bio, voting record) said.
A similar effort failed in the Senate in 2004.
Gay marriage has been a hot topic since a Massachusetts court ruled in 2003 that the state legislature could not ban it, paving the way for America's first same-sex marriages in May the following year.
At least 13 states have passed amendments banning gay marriage while two -- Vermont and Connecticut -- have legalized civil unions. California, New Jersey, Maine, the District of Columbia and Hawaii each offer gay couples some legal rights as partners.
Legal challenges seeking permission for gays and lesbians to marry are pending in 10 states. Most recently, a Georgia state court struck down a state ban on Tuesday.
Just over half of all Americans oppose same-sex marriage, according to a March poll by the Pew Research center, down from 63 percent in February 2004.
Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy (news, bio, voting record), the committee's top Democrat, said the gay marriage ban was a waste of time for a committee that needs to tackle a wide range of other pressing issues, from judicial nominations to oversight of the National Security Administration's domestic-spying program.
"I didn't realize marriages were so threatened. Nor did my wife of 44 years," Leahy said.
Leahy said Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch (news, bio, voting record), who supports the ban, has expressed support for polygamists in his home state of Utah.
"I never said that," Hatch responded. "I know some (polygamists) that are very sincere. ... Don't accuse me of wanting to have polygamy."
1 Comments:
Hi Tom,
Does he mean polygamists are sincere but gays and lesbians are NOT? Jerks - f..g Republicans. Sondra
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home