Twain - the King's Justice
Hey Folks,
I’ve been re-reading Mark Twain’s A Connecticut Yankee In King Arthur’s Court and sharing pieces of Twain’s political commentary with you here (this is the 11th entry) .
His insights remain pertinent to this day. We haven’t changed much from Twain’s day – or from King Arthur’s, for that matter (see the post directly above for proof of that).
Chapter 25 – The Yankee explains the King’s justice (sounds familiar).
And although this expedition was strictly a holiday excursion for the king, he kept some of his business functions going, just the same. He touched for the evil as usual; he held court in the gate at sunrise and tried causes, for he was himself Chief Justice of the King’s Bench.
He shone very well in this latter office. He was a wise and humane judge, and he clearly did his honest best and fairest, - according to his lights. Yes, according to his lights. That is a large reservation. His lights – I mean his rearing – often colored his decisions. Whenever there was a dispute between a noble or gentleman, and a person of lower degree, the king’s leanings and sympathies were for the former class always, whether he suspected it or not. It was impossible that this should be otherwise. The blunting effects of slavery upon the slaveholder’s moral perceptions are known and conceded, the world over, and a privileged class, an aristocracy, is but a band of slaveholders under another name. This has a harsh sound, and yet should not be offensive to any – to even the noble himself – unless the fact itself be an offence; for the statement simply formulates a fact. The repulsive feature of slavery is the THING, not its name. One needs but to hear an aristocrat speak of the classes that are below him to recognize – and in but indifferently modified measure – the very air and tone of the actual slaveholder; and behind these are the slaveholder’s spirit, the slaveholder’s blunted feeling. They are the result of the same cause, in both cases; the possessor’s old and inbred custom of regarding himself as a superior being. The king’s judgments wrought frequent injustices, but it was merely the fault of his training, his natural and unalterable sympathies. He was as unfitted for a judgeship as would be the average mother for the position of milk-distributor to starving children in famine-time; her own children would fare a shade better than the rest.
I’ve been re-reading Mark Twain’s A Connecticut Yankee In King Arthur’s Court and sharing pieces of Twain’s political commentary with you here (this is the 11th entry) .
His insights remain pertinent to this day. We haven’t changed much from Twain’s day – or from King Arthur’s, for that matter (see the post directly above for proof of that).
Chapter 25 – The Yankee explains the King’s justice (sounds familiar).
And although this expedition was strictly a holiday excursion for the king, he kept some of his business functions going, just the same. He touched for the evil as usual; he held court in the gate at sunrise and tried causes, for he was himself Chief Justice of the King’s Bench.
He shone very well in this latter office. He was a wise and humane judge, and he clearly did his honest best and fairest, - according to his lights. Yes, according to his lights. That is a large reservation. His lights – I mean his rearing – often colored his decisions. Whenever there was a dispute between a noble or gentleman, and a person of lower degree, the king’s leanings and sympathies were for the former class always, whether he suspected it or not. It was impossible that this should be otherwise. The blunting effects of slavery upon the slaveholder’s moral perceptions are known and conceded, the world over, and a privileged class, an aristocracy, is but a band of slaveholders under another name. This has a harsh sound, and yet should not be offensive to any – to even the noble himself – unless the fact itself be an offence; for the statement simply formulates a fact. The repulsive feature of slavery is the THING, not its name. One needs but to hear an aristocrat speak of the classes that are below him to recognize – and in but indifferently modified measure – the very air and tone of the actual slaveholder; and behind these are the slaveholder’s spirit, the slaveholder’s blunted feeling. They are the result of the same cause, in both cases; the possessor’s old and inbred custom of regarding himself as a superior being. The king’s judgments wrought frequent injustices, but it was merely the fault of his training, his natural and unalterable sympathies. He was as unfitted for a judgeship as would be the average mother for the position of milk-distributor to starving children in famine-time; her own children would fare a shade better than the rest.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home